Effect of proton irradiation on the normal state low-energy excitations of Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Rh$_x$)$_2$As$_2$ superconductors
M. Moroni, L. Gozzelino, G. Ghigo, M. A. Tanatar, R. Prozorov, P. C. Canfield, P. Carretta
arXiv:1705.06905 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.094523 · 2017-05-19 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a \asnmr Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and resistivity study of the effect of 5.5 MeV proton irradiation on the optimal electron doped ($x=$ 0.068) and overdoped ($x=$ 0.107) Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Rh$_x$)$_2$As$_2$ iron based superconductors. While the proton induced defects only mildly suppress the critical temperature and increase residual resistivity in both compositions, sizable broadening of the NMR spectra was observed in all the irradiated samples at low temperature. The effect is significantly stronger in the optimally doped sample where the Curie Weiss temperature dependence of the line width suggests the onset of ferromagnetic correlations coexisting with superconductivity at the nanoscale. 1/T$_2$ measurements revealed that the energy barrier characterizing the low energy spin fluctuations of these compounds is enhanced upon proton irradiation, suggesting that the defects are likely slowing down the fluctuations between ($0,π)$ and ($π$,0) nematic ground states.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ba(Fe0.932Rh0.068)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23.3 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Ba(Fe0.893Rh0.107)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.7 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Ba(Fe0.932Rh0.068)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 22.3 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Ba(Fe0.932Rh0.068)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 21.3 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Ba(Fe0.893Rh0.107)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12.9 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Ba(Fe0.893Rh0.107)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Ba(Fe0.932Rh0.068)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23.3 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Ba(Fe0.893Rh0.107)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.7 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Ba(Fe0.932Rh0.068)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.932Rh0.068)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 22 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.893Rh0.107)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe0.893Rh0.107)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Effect of proton irradiation on the normal-state low-energy excitations of Ba(Fe1−xRhx)2As2 superconductors
similarity 0.92M. Moroni et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrodynamic response of Ba(Fe1-xRhx)2As2 across the s+- to s++ order parameter transition
similarity 0.91D. Torsello et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1906.08478
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of electron irradiation on resistivity and London penetration depth of Ba1−xKxFe2As2 (x≤0.34) iron-pnictide superconductor
similarity 0.90K. Cho et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Iron-based superconductors: tales from the nuclei
similarity 0.90Pietro Carretta & Giacomo Prando · 2019 · arXiv:1912.02603
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression of the critical temperature of superconducting Ba(Fe1−xCox)2As2 by point defects from proton irradiation
similarity 0.90Yasuyuki Nakajima et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of Electron Correlations on Magnetic Excitations in the Isovalently Doped Iron-Based Superconductor Ba(Fe1−xRux)2As2
similarity 0.90Jun Zhao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified