Correlation between charge order and second-neighbor hopping in cuprate superconductors
Huaisong Zhao, Yingping Mou, Shiping Feng
arXiv:1709.03674 · DOI 10.1007/s10948-017-4327-7 · 2017-09-12 · Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The correlation between the charge-order wave vector Q_{CD} and second-neighbor hopping t' in cuprate superconductors is studied based on the t-t'-J model. It is shown that the magnitude of the charge-order wave vector Q_{CD} increases with the increase of t', and then the experimentally observed differences of the magnitudes of the charge-order wave vector Q_{CD} among the different families of cuprate superconductors at the same doping concentration can be attributed to the different values of t'.
Similar papers
Interplay between charge order and superconductivity in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.94Deheng Gao et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1803.07432
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping and momentum dependence of coupling strength in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.90Yingping Mou et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.00803
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic dressing of electrons in electron-doped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.89Shuning Tan et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2010.06781
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Disorder effects at a nematic quantum critical point in d-wave cuprate superconductor
similarity 0.87Jing Wang et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1101.1551
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental Investigation of the Competing Orders and Quantum Criticality in Hole- and Electron-Doped Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.86N. -C. Yeh et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0408105
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Calculated Magnetic Exchange Interactions in High-Temeprature Superconductors
similarity 0.86Xiangang Wan et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0810.5216
Source status unknown — claims are unverified