Anisotropic dressing of electrons in electron-doped cuprate superconductors
Shuning Tan, Yiqun Liu, Yingping Mou, Shiping Feng
arXiv:2010.06781 · DOI 10.1103/physrevb.103.014503 · 2020-10-14 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The recent experiments revealed a remarkable possibility for the absence of the disparity between the phase diagrams of the electron- and hole-doped cuprate superconductors, while such an aspect should be also reflected in the dressing of the electrons. Here the phase diagram of the electron-doped cuprate superconductors and the related exotic features of the anisotropic dressing of the electrons are studied based on the kinetic-energy driven superconductivity. It is shown that although the optimized Tc in the electron-doped side is much smaller than that in the hole-doped case, the electron- and hole-doped cuprate superconductors rather resemble each other in the doping range of the superconducting dome, indicating an absence of the disparity between the phase diagrams of the electron- and hole-doped cuprate superconductors. In particular, the anisotropic dressing of the electrons due to the strong electron's coupling to a strongly dispersive spin excitation leads to that the electron Fermi surface is truncated to form the disconnected Fermi arcs centered around the nodal region. Concomitantly, the dip in the peak-dip-hump structure of the quasiparticle excitation spectrum is directly associated with the corresponding peak in the quasiparticle scattering rate, while the dispersion kink is always accompanied by the corresponding inflection point in the total self-energy, as the dip in the peak-dip-hump structure and dispersion kink in the hole-doped counterparts. The theory also predicts that both the normal and anomalous self-energies exhibit the well-pronounced low-energy peak-structures.
Similar papers
ARPES autocorrelation in electron-doped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.94Shuning Tan et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2001.06748
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic dressing of electrons in electron-doped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.92Shuning Tan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The magnetic nature of superconductivity in doped cuprates
similarity 0.91Shiping Feng et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407310
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap-induced coexistence of Fermi arcs and Fermi pockets in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91Huaisong Zhao et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1608.04256
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping dependence of charge order in electron-doped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91Yingping Mou & Shiping Feng · 2017 · arXiv:1705.11072
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Extended superconducting dome of electron-doped cuprates after protect annealing revealed by ARPES
similarity 0.91C. Lin et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2006.04524
Source status unknown — claims are unverified