Metallic supercurrent field-effect transistor
G. De Simoni, F. Paolucci, P. Solinas, E. Strambini, F. Giazotto
arXiv:1710.02400 · DOI 10.1038/s41565-018-0190-3 · 2017-10-06 · Nature Nanotechnology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In their original formulation of superconductivity, the London brothers predicted the exponential suppression of an $electrostatic$ field inside a superconductor over the so-called London penetration depth, $λ_L$. Despite a few experiments indicating hints of perturbation induced by electrostatic fields, no clue has been provided so far on the possibility to manipulate metallic superconductors via field-effect. Here we report field-effect control of the supercurrent in $all$-metallic transistors made of different Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) superconducting thin films. At low temperature, our field-effect transistors (FETs) show a monotonic decay of the critical current under increasing electrostatic field up to total quenching for gate voltage values as large as $\pm 40$V in titanium-based devices. This $bipolar$ field effect persists up to $\sim 85\%$ of the critical temperature ($\sim 0.41$K), and in the presence of sizable magnetic fields. A similar behavior was observed in aluminum thin film FETs. A phenomenological theory accounts for our observations, and points towards the interpretation in terms of an electric-field-induced perturbation propagating inside the superconducting film. In our understanding, this affects the pairing potential and quenches the supercurrent. These results could represent a groundbreaking asset for the realization of an $all$-metallic superconducting field-effect electronics and leading-edge quantum information architectures.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ti Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.48 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Bipolar Thermoelectric Superconducting Quantum Devices
similarity 0.89F. Antola et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2607.23262
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transparent Gatable Superconducting Shadow Junctions
similarity 0.89Sabbir A. Khan et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.04487
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Full control of quantum Hall supercurrent in a side gated graphene Josephson junction
similarity 0.89Andrew Seredinski et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1901.05928
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Heat rectification via a superconducting artificial atom
similarity 0.89Jorden Senior et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.05574
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field-Effect Controllable Metallic Josephson Interferometer
similarity 0.88Federico Paolucci et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1904.08349
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Towards the discovery of high critical magnetic field superconductors
similarity 0.88Benjamin Geisler et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2601.21044
Source status unknown — claims are unverified