Tunable superconducting critical temperature in ballistic hybrid structures with strong spin-orbit coupling
Haakon T. Simensen, Jacob Linder
arXiv:1710.03228 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.054518 · 2017-10-09 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a theoretical description and numerical simulations of the superconducting transition in hybrid structures including strong spin-orbit interactions. The spin-orbit coupling is taken to be of Rashba type for concreteness, and we allow for an arbitrary magnitude of the spin-orbit strength as well as an arbitrary thickness of the spin-orbit coupled layer. This allows us to make contact with the experimentally relevant case of enhanced interfacial spin-orbit coupling via atomically thin heavy metal layers. We consider both interfacial spin-orbit coupling induced by inversion asymmetry in an S/F-junction, as well as in-plane spin-orbit coupling in the ferromagnetic region of an S/F/S- and an S/F-structure. Both the pair amplitudes, local density of states and critical temperature show dependency on the Rashba strength and, importantly, the orientation of the exchange field. In general, spin-orbit coupling increases the critical temperature of a proximity system where a magnetic field is present, and enhances the superconducting gap in the density of states. We perform a theoretical derivation which explains these results by the appearance of long-ranged singlet correlations. Our results suggest that $T_c$ in ballistic spin-orbit coupled superconducting structures may be tuned by using only a single ferromagnetic layer.
Similar papers
Multi-band effects on Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov states of Pauli-limited superconductors
similarity 0.90Masahiro Takahashi et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1401.1351
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunneling conductance in semiconductor-superconductor hybrid structures
similarity 0.90John Stenger & Tudor D. Stanescu · 2017 · arXiv:1703.02543
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic Theory of Superconducting Phase Diagram in Infinite-Layer Nickelates
similarity 0.90T. Y. Xie et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.01677
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robustness of Majorana Modes and Minigaps in a Spin-Orbit-Coupled Semiconductor-Superconductor Heterostructure
similarity 0.90Li Mao & Chuanwei Zhang · 2010 · arXiv:1007.2972
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Emergence of Triplet Correlations in Superconductor/Half Metallic Nanojunctions with Spin Active Interfaces
similarity 0.90Klaus Halterman & Oriol T. Valls · 2009 · arXiv:0907.2688
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
{\em Ab Initio} Calculations of in Type-II Superconductors: Basic Formalism and Model Calculations
similarity 0.90Takafumi Kita & Masao Arai · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0403314
Source status unknown — claims are unverified