Microscopic Theory of Superconducting Phase Diagram in Infinite-Layer Nickelates
T. Y. Xie, Z. Liu, Chao Cao, Z. F. Wang, J. L. Yang, W. Zhu
arXiv:2112.01677 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.035111 · 2021-12-03 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Since the discovery of superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates RNiO$_2$ (R=La, Pr, Nd), great research efforts have been paid to unveil its underlying superconducting mechanism. However, the physical origin of the intriguing hole-doped superconductivity phase diagram, characterized by a superconductivity dome sandwiched between two weak insulators, is still unclear. Here, we present a microscopic theory for electronic structure of nickelates from a fundamental model-based perspective. We found that the appearance of weak insulator phase in lightly and heavily hole-doped regime is dominated by Mottness and Hundness, respectively, exhibiting a unique orbital-selective doping originated from the competition of Hund interaction and crystal field splitting. Moreover, the superconducting phase can also be created in the "mixed" transition regime between Mott-insulator and Hund-induced insulator, exactly reproducing the experimentally observed superconducting phase diagram. Our findings not only demonstrate the orbital-dependent strong-correlation physics in Ni 3$d$ states, but also provide a unified understanding of superconducting phase diagram in hole-doped infinite-layer nickelates, which are distinct from the well-established paradigms in cuprates and iron pnictides.
Similar papers
Spin and charge transport in ferromagnet-superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures: Stoner versus spin mass mismatch mechanism
similarity 0.92Paola Gentile et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.03335
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical response of edge modes in time-reversal symmetric topological superconductors
similarity 0.92Hirokazu Kobayashi et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2411.09985
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting order parameter in aperiodic binary systems
similarity 0.92Sougata Biswas et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2507.14671
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity-Induced Superconductivity at Non-Helical Topological Insulator Interfaces
similarity 0.91David J. Alspaugh et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1807.04841
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase Slips and Interfaces in D-Wave Superconductors
similarity 0.91Andrew M. Martin & James F. Annett · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9910208
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-orbit-coupled ferroelectric superconductivity
similarity 0.91Shota Kanasugi & Youichi Yanase · 2018 · arXiv:1803.07279
Source status unknown — claims are unverified