Spin and charge transport in ferromagnet-superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures: Stoner versus spin mass mismatch mechanism
Paola Gentile, Marilena Catapano, Nicola De Vivo, Mario Cuoco, Alfonso Romano, Canio Noce
arXiv:2206.03335 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.214501 · 2022-06-07 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study transport phenomena through a ballistic ferromagnet-superconductor-ferromagnet (F/S/F) junction, comparing the case in which the ferromagnetic order in the two F layers is of the standard Stoner type with the case where it is driven by a spin mass mismatch (SMM). It is shown that the two mechanisms lead to a different behavior in the charge and the spin conductances, especially when compared to the corresponding non-superconducting ferromagnet-normal-ferromagnet (F/N/F) junctions. In particular, when the injected current is perpendicular to the barrier, for high barrier transparency and large magnetization of the F layers, the large mass mismatch gives rise to an enhancement of both low-bias charge and spin conductances of the F/S/F junction, which is not observed in the equal-mass case. When all the allowed injection directions are considered, the low bias enhancement of the charge conductance for SMM leads still holds for high barrier transparency and large magnetization of the F layers. However, in the case of non-transparent interfaces, spin transport with SMM ferromagnets exhibits an opposite sign response with respect to the Stoner case at high biases for all magnetization values, also manifesting a significant amplification induced by superconductivity at the gap edge. The above mentioned differences can be exploited to probe the nature of the electronic mechanism underlying the establishment of the ferromagnetic order in a given material.
Similar papers
Magnetic exchange interactions at the proximity of a superconductor
similarity 0.93Uriel Allan Aceves Rodríguez et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.02906
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Free Energy of an Inhomogeneous Superconductor: a Wave Function Approach
similarity 0.93Ioan Kosztin et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9803317
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossed Andreev reflection revealed by self-consistent Keldysh-Usadel formalism
similarity 0.93Johanne Bratland Tjernshaugen et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.18191
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous supercurrent modulated by interfacial magnetizations in Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic bilayers
similarity 0.93Hao Meng et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.12718
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interference phenomena in Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic bilayers: Spin-triplet correlations and resonances
similarity 0.92Danilo Nikolić et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.05770
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Perfect crossed Andreev reflection in the proximitized graphene/superconductor/proximitized graphene junctions
similarity 0.92Shu-Chang Zhao et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.17301
Source status unknown — claims are unverified