Crossed Andreev reflection revealed by self-consistent Keldysh-Usadel formalism
Johanne Bratland Tjernshaugen, Morten Amundsen, Jacob Linder
arXiv:2409.18191 · 2024-09-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Crossed Andreev reflection (CAR) is a process that creates entanglement between spatially separated electrons and holes. Such entangled pairs have potential applications in quantum information processing, and it is therefore relevant to determine how the probability for CAR can be increased. CAR competes with another non-local process called elastic cotunneling (EC), which does not create entanglement. In conventional normal metal/superconductor/normal metal heterostructures, earlier theoretical work predicted that EC dominates over CAR. Nevertheless, we show numerically that when the Keldysh-Usadel equations are solved self-consistently in the superconductor, CAR can dominate over EC. Self-consistency is necessary both for the conversion from a quasiparticle current to a supercurrent and to describe the spatial variation of the order parameter correctly. A requirement for the CAR probability to surpass the EC probability is that the inverse proximity effect is small. Otherwise, the subvoltage density of states becomes large and EC is strengthened by quasiparticles flowing through the superconductor. Therefore, CAR becomes dominant in the non-local transport with increasing interface resistance and length of the superconducting region. Our results show that even the simplest possible experimental setup with easily accessible normal metals and superconductors can provide dominant CAR by designing the experimental parameters correctly. We also find that spin-splitting in the superconductor increases the subvoltage density of states, and thus always favors EC over CAR. Finally, we tune the chemical potential in the leads such that transport is governed by electrons of one spin type. This can increase the CAR probability at finite values of the spin-splitting compared to using a spin-degenerate voltage bias, and provides a way to control the spin of the conduction electrons electrically.
Similar papers
Two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy of disordered superconductors in the narrow-band and broad-band limits
similarity 0.92Naoto Tsuji · 2026 · arXiv:2509.03936
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cross-correlated shot noise in three-terminal superconducting hybrid nanostructures
similarity 0.92Dmitry S. Golubev & Andrei D. Zaikin · 2019 · arXiv:1902.05476
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Full Counting Statistics of Yu-Shiba-Rusinov Bound States
similarity 0.92David Christian Ohnmacht et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.04758
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting electron and hole lenses
similarity 0.91Hosein Cheraghchi et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.06892
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnon-Cooparons in magnet-superconductor hybrids
similarity 0.91I. V. Bobkova et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.05336
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin Transport in Diffusive Superconductors
similarity 0.91Jan Petter Morten et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401580
Source status unknown — claims are unverified