Neutron spin resonance in the 112-type iron-based superconductor
Tao Xie, Dongliang Gong, Haranath Ghosh, Abyay Ghosh, Minoru Soda, Takatsugu Masuda, Shinichi Itoh, Frederic Bourdarot, Louis-Pierre Regnault, Sergey Danilkin, Shiliang Li, Huiqian Luo
arXiv:1803.00779 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.137001 · 2018-03-02 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We use inelastic neutron scattering to study the low-energy spin excitations of 112-type iron pnictide Ca$_{0.82}$La$_{0.18}$Fe$_{0.96}$Ni$_{0.04}$As$_{2}$ with bulk superconductivity below $T_c=22$ K. A two-dimensional spin resonance mode is found around $E=$ 11 meV, where the resonance energy is almost temperature independent and linearly scales with $T_c$ along with other iron-based superconductors. Polarized neutron analysis reveals the resonance is nearly isotropic in spin space without any $L$ modulations. Due to the unique monoclinic structure with additional zigzag arsenic chains, the As $4p$ orbitals contribute to a three-dimensional hole pocket around $Γ$ point and an extra electron pocket at $X$ point. Our results suggest that the energy and momentum distribution of spin resonance does not directly response to the $k_z$ dependence of fermiology, and the spin resonance intrinsically is a spin-1 mode from singlet-triplet excitations of the Cooper pairs in the case of weak spin-orbital coupling.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ca0.82La0.18Fe0.96Ni0.04As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 22 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Ca1-xLaxFeAs2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 34 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Neutron Spin Resonance in the 112-Type Iron-Based Superconductor
similarity 0.93Tao Xie et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Neutron spin resonance in a quasi-two-dimensional iron-based superconductor
similarity 0.92Wenshan Hong et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2005.06146
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron doping evolution of the neutron spin resonance in NaFeCoAs
similarity 0.90Chenglin Zhang et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.06890
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin resonance in the superconducting state of LiFeODFeSe observed by neutron spectroscopy
similarity 0.90N. R. Davies et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1607.05588
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase stability and large in-plane resistivity anisotropy in the 112-type iron-based superconductor Ca1−xLaxFeAs2
similarity 0.90Chang-Jong Kang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Itinerant spin fluctuations in iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.90Maxim M. Korshunov · 2017 · arXiv:1710.09888
Source status unknown — claims are unverified