← Back to search

Tile-and-trim micro-resonator array fabrication optimized for high multiplexing factors

Christopher M. McKenney, Jason E. Austermann, Jim Beall, Bradley Dober, Shannon M. Duff, Jiansong Gao, Gence C. Hilton, Johannes Hubmayr, Dale Li, Joel N. Ullom, Jeff Van Lanen, Michael R. Vissers

arXiv:1803.04275 · DOI 10.1063/1.5037301 · 2018-03-12 · The Review of scientific instruments

T1experimental15 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We present a superconducting micro-resonator array fabrication method that is scalable, reconfigurable, and has been optimized for high multiplexing factors. The method uses uniformly sized tiles patterned on stepper photolithography reticles as the building blocks of an array. We demonstrate this technique on a 101-element microwave kinetic inductance detector (MKID) array made from a titanium-nitride superconducting film. Characterization reveals 1.5\% maximum fractional frequency spacing deviations caused primarily by material parameters that vary smoothly across the wafer. However, local deviations exhibit a Gaussian distribution in fractional frequency spacing with a standard deviation of $2.7 \times 10^{-3}$. We exploit this finding to increase the yield of the BLAST-TNG $250 \; μ\text{m}$ production wafer by placing resonators in the array close in both physical and frequency space. This array consists of 1836 polarization-sensitive MKIDs wired in three multiplexing groups. We present the array design and show that the achieved yield is consistent with our model of frequency collisions and is comparable to what has been achieved in other low temperature detector technologies.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
TiN

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.7Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers