Absence of superconductivity in iron polyhydrides at high pressures
Christoph Heil, Giovanni B. Bachelet, Lilia Boeri
arXiv:1804.03572 · 2018-04-10
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recently, C. M. Pépin \textit{et al.} [Science \textbf{357}, 382 (2017)] reported the formation of several new iron polyhydrides FeH$_x$ at pressures in the megabar range, and spotted FeH$_5$, which forms above 130 GPa, as a potential high-\tc \ superconductor, because of an alleged layer of dense metallic hydrogen. Shortly after, two studies by A.~Majumdar \textit{et al.} [Phys. Rev. B \textbf{96}, 201107 (2017)] and A.~G.~Kvashnin \textit{et al.} [J. Phys. Chem. C \textbf{122}, 4731 (2018)] based on {\em ab initio} Migdal-Eliashberg theory seemed to independently confirm such a conjecture. We conversely find, on the same theoretical-numerical basis, that neither FeH$_5$ nor its precursor, FeH$_3$, shows any conventional superconductivity and explain why this is the case. We also show that superconductivity may be attained by transition-metal polyhydrides in the FeH$_3$ structure type by adding more electrons to partially fill one of the Fe--H hybrid bands (as, e.g., in NiH$_3$). Critical temperatures, however, will remain low because the $d$--metal bonding, and not the metallic hydrogen, dominates the behavior of electrons and phonons involved in the superconducting pairing in these compounds.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| H3S Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 203 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeH5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 56 | 130 GPa | unknown |
| FeH5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | 150 GPa | unknown |
| FeH3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | 150 GPa | unknown |
Similar papers
Absence of superconductivity in iron polyhydrides at high pressures
similarity 0.92Christoph Heil et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in atom-intercalated quaternary hydrides under ambient pressure
similarity 0.91Bo-Wen Yao et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2508.10912
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pressure versus concentration tuning of the superconductivity in Ba(Fe(1-x)Cox)2As2
similarity 0.88Sandra Drotziger et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1010.3863
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in FeH5
similarity 0.88Arnab Majumdar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron- and hole-doping on ScH and YH: Effects on superconductivity without applied pressure
similarity 0.88S. Villa-Cortés & O. De la Peña-Seaman · 2021 · arXiv:2106.10379
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crystal Structures and Properties of Iron Hydrides at High Pressure
similarity 0.87Niloofar Zarifi et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1809.08323
Source status unknown — claims are unverified