Digital coherent control of a superconducting qubit
Edward Leonard, Matthew A. Beck, JJ Nelson, Brad G. Christensen, Ted Thorbeck, Caleb Howington, Alexander Opremcak, Ivan V. Pechenezhskiy, Kenneth Dodge, Nicholas P. Dupuis, Jaseung Ku, Francisco Schlenker, Joseph Suttle, Christopher Wilen, Shaojiang Zhu, Maxim G. Vavilov, Britton L. T. Plourde, Robert McDermott
arXiv:1806.07930 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.014009 · 2018-06-20 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
High-fidelity gate operations are essential to the realization of a fault-tolerant quantum computer. In addition, the physical resources required to implement gates must scale efficiently with system size. A longstanding goal of the superconducting qubit community is the tight integration of a superconducting quantum circuit with a proximal classical cryogenic control system. Here we implement coherent control of a superconducting transmon qubit using a Single Flux Quantum (SFQ) pulse driver cofabricated on the qubit chip. The pulse driver delivers trains of quantized flux pulses to the qubit through a weak capacitive coupling; coherent rotations of the qubit state are realized when the pulse-to-pulse timing is matched to a multiple of the qubit oscillation period. We measure the fidelity of SFQ-based gates to be ~95% using interleaved randomized benchmarking. Gate fidelities are limited by quasiparticle generation in the dissipative SFQ driver. We characterize the dissipative and dispersive contributions of the quasiparticle admittance and discuss mitigation strategies to suppress quasiparticle poisoning. These results open the door to integration of large-scale superconducting qubit arrays with SFQ control elements for low-latency feedback and stabilization.
Similar papers
Single-shot qubit readout in circuit Quantum Electrodynamics
similarity 0.90François Mallet et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1005.3436
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single-shot qubit readout in circuit Quantum Electrodynamics
similarity 0.90François Mallet et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1005.5615
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anodization-free fabrication process for high-quality cross-type Josephson tunnel junctions based on a Nb/Al-AlO/Nb trilayer
similarity 0.90Fabienne Adam et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.01806
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Space-Time-Coupled Qubits for Enhanced Superconducting Quantum Computing
similarity 0.90Taravati, Sajjad · 2025 · arXiv:2501.16872
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum State Sensitivity of an Autoresonant Superconducting Circuit
similarity 0.90K. W. Murch et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1208.4646
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single Flux Quantum-Based Digital Control of Superconducting Qubits in a Multi-Chip Module
similarity 0.89Chuan-Hong Liu et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.05696
Source status unknown — claims are unverified