Microscopic tunneling model of Nb-AlN-NbN Josephson flux-flow oscillator
Dmitry R. Gulevich, Lyudmila V. Filippenko, Valery P. Koshelets
arXiv:1809.01642 · DOI 10.1007/s10909-018-2106-x · 2018-09-05 · Journal of Low Temperature Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Since the very first experimental realization of Josephson flux-flow oscillator (FFO), its theoretical description has been limited by the phenomenological per- turbed sine-Gordon equation (PSGE). While PSGE can qualitatively describe the topological excitations in Josephson junctions that are sine-Gordon solitons or flux- ons, it is unable to capture essential physical phenomena of a realistic system such as the coupling between tunnel currents and electromagnetic radiation. Furthermore, PSGE neglects any dependence on energy gaps of superconductors and makes no distinction between symmetric and asymmetric junctions: those made of two iden- tical or two different superconducting materials. It was not until recently when it became possible to calculate properties of FFO by taking into account information about energy gaps of superconductors [D. R. Gulevich et al., Phys. Rev. B 96, 024215 (2017)]. Such approach is based on the microscopic tunneling theory and has been shown to describe essential features of symmetric Nb-AlOx-Nb junctions. Here we extend this approach to asymmetric Nb-AlN-NbN junctions and compare the calculated current-voltage characteristics to our experimental results.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Feromagnetic ""-junctions
similarity 0.87T. Kontos et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0201104
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Advanced microwave SQUID multiplexer model incorporating readout power effects and Josephson junction inhomogeneities
similarity 0.87Martin Neidig et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.09600
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fabrication and characterization of Nb/Al-AlN /Nb superconducting tunnel junctions
similarity 0.87Alexey Pavolotsky et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.06994
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson Flux Flow Oscillator: the Microscopic Tunneling Approach
similarity 0.87D. R. Gulevich et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1704.03045
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single electron transistors with high quality superconducting niobium islands
similarity 0.87R. Dolata et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0111580
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Minimizing the linewidth of the Flux-Flow Oscillator
similarity 0.87A. L. Pankratov · 2007 · arXiv:0707.1413
Source status unknown — claims are unverified