Current distribution across type II superconducting films: a new vortex-free critical state
Evgeny F. Talantsev, A. E. Pantoja, Wayne P. Crump, Jeffery L. Tallon
arXiv:1811.12519 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-20279-3 · 2018-11-29 · Scientific Reports
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The current distribution across the thickness of a current-carrying rectangular film in the Meissner state was established long ago by the London brothers. The distribution across the width is more complicated but was later shown to be highly non-uniform, diverging at the edges. Accordingly, the standard view for type II superconductors is that vortices enter at the edges and, with increasing current, are driven inwards until they self-annihilate at the centre, causing dissipation. This condition is presumed to define the critical current. However we have shown that, under self-field (no external field), the transport critical current is a London surface current where the surface current density equals the critical field divided by λ, across the entire width. The critical current distribution must therefore be uniform. Here we report studies of the current and field distribution across commercial YBa2Cu3O7 conductors and confirm the accepted non-uniform distribution at low current but demonstrate a radical crossover to a uniform distribution at critical current. This crossover ends discontinuously at a singularity and calculations quantitatively confirm these results in detail. The onset of self-field dissipation is, unexpectedly, thermodynamic in character and the implied vortex-free critical state seems to require new physics.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Thermodynamic parameters of single- or multi-band superconductors derived from self-field critical currents
similarity 0.90Evgeny F. Talantsev et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1609.03670
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical currents in vicinal YBaCuO films
similarity 0.89J. H. Durrell et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0406620
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex dynamics in YBa2Cu3O7−δ superconducting films: Experimental evidence for an instability in the vortex system at high current densities
similarity 0.87Z. L. Xiao & P. Ziemann
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal temperature scaling of flux line pinning in high-temperature superconducting thin films
similarity 0.87J Albrecht et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0704.2112
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-polarized quasiparticle transport in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.87C. -C. Fu et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0206254
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex properties of YBa2Cu3O7 superconducting thin films: Irreversible magnetization and the effect of thickness
similarity 0.87Chang Jun Liu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified