Stabilization and heteroepitaxial growth of metastable tetragonal FeS thin films by pulsed laser deposition
Kota Hanzawa, Masato Sasase, Hidenori Hiramatsu, Hideo Hosono
arXiv:1903.08820 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/ab097e · 2019-03-21
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Pulsed laser deposition, a non-equilibrium thin-film growth technique, was used to stabilize metastable tetragonal iron sulfide (FeS), the bulk state of which is known as a superconductor with a critical temperature of 4 K. Comprehensive experiments revealed four important factors to stabilize tetragonal FeS epitaxial thin films: (i) an optimum growth temperature of 300 °C followed by thermal quenching, (ii) an optimum growth rate of ~7 nm/min, (iii) use of a high-purity bulk target, and (iv) use of a single-crystal substrate with small in-plane lattice mismatch (CaF2). Electrical resistivity measurements indicated that none of all the films exhibited superconductivity. Although an electric double-layer transistor structure was fabricated using the tetragonal FeS epitaxial film as a channel layer to achieve high-density carrier doping, no phase transition was observed. Possible reasons for the lack of superconductivity include lattice strain, off-stoichiometry of the film, electrochemical etching by the ionic liquid under gate bias, and surface degradation during device fabrication.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeS Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
High performance FeSe0.5Te0.5 thin films grown at low temperature by pulsed laser deposition
similarity 0.89Pusheng Yuan et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1504.00435
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interface control by homoepitaxial growth in pulsed laser deposited iron chalcogenide thin ilms
similarity 0.89Sebastian Molatta et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1512.02524
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Morphology of Superconducting FeSe thin films deposited by co-sputtering and MBE
similarity 0.87Eike Venzmer et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1505.02630
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Growth of superconducting epitaxial films of sulfur substituted FeSe via pulsed laser deposition
similarity 0.86Fuyuki Nabeshima et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.00380
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure and nematic phase transition in superconducting multi-layer FeSe films grown by pulsed laser deposition method
similarity 0.86Bing Shen et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1706.05790
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of strain on the electronic structure, superconductivity, and nematicity in FeSe studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy
similarity 0.86G. N. Phan et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1706.05129
Source status unknown — claims are unverified