Phase stiffness in an antiferromagnetic superconductor
Walter Metzner, Hiroyuki Yamase
arXiv:1904.06115 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.014504 · 2019-04-12 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze the suppression of the phase stiffness in a superconductor by antiferromagnetic order. The analysis is based on a general expression for the phase stiffness in a mean-field state with coexisting spin-singlet superconductivity and spiral magnetism. Neel order is included as a special case. Close to half-filling, where the pairing gap is much smaller than the magnetic gap, a simple formula for the phase stiffness in terms of magnetic quasi-particle bands is derived. The phase stiffness is determined by charge carriers in small electron or hole pockets in this regime. The general analysis is complemented by a numerical calculation for the two-dimensional Hubbard model with nearest and next-to-nearest neighbor hopping amplitudes at a moderate interaction strength. The resulting phase stiffness exhibits a striking electron-hole asymmetry. In the ground state, it is larger than the pairing gap on the hole-doped side, and smaller for electron doping. Hence, in the hole-doped regime near half-filling the ground state pairing gap sets the scale for the Kosterlitz-Thouless temperature T_c^{KT}, while in the slightly electron-doped regime T_c^{KT} is determined essentially by the ground state phase stiffness.
Similar papers
Phase stiffness in an antiferromagnetic superconductor
similarity 0.92Walter Metzner & Hiroyuki Yamase
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the two-dimensional --Hubbard model
similarity 0.89Andreas Eberlein & Walter Metzner · 2013 · arXiv:1308.4845
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of symmetry-resolved quench-drive spectroscopy: Nonlinear response of phase-fluctuating superconductors
similarity 0.89Matteo Puviani · 2024 · arXiv:2402.02120
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antiferromagnetism and phase separation in the t-J model at low doping: a variational study
similarity 0.88D. A. Ivanov · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0309265
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The effect of spin fluctuations on the electronic structure in iron based superconductors
similarity 0.88Andreas Heimes et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1206.0904
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interrelation between antiferromagnetic and superconducting gaps in high-Tc materials
similarity 0.88E. Arrigoni et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0105125
Source status unknown — claims are unverified