← Back to search

High Frequency Nonlinear Response of Superconducting Cavity-Grade Nb surfaces

Bakhrom Oripov, Thomas Bieler, Gianluigi Ciovati, Sergio Calatroni, Pashupati Dhakal, Tobias Junginger, Oleg B. Malyshev, Giovanni Terenziani, Anne-Marie Valente-Feliciano, Reza Valizadeh, Stuart Wilde, Steven M. Anlage

arXiv:1904.07432 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.064030 · 2019-04-16 · Physical Review Applied

T1theoretical17 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Nb Superconducting Radio-Frequency (SRF) cavities are observed to break down and lose their high-Q superconducting properties at accelerating gradients below the limits imposed by theory. The microscopic origins of SRF cavity breakdown are still a matter of some debate. To investigate these microscopic issues temperature and power dependent local third harmonic response was measured on bulk Nb and Nb thin film samples using a novel near-field magnetic microwave microscope between 2.9K-10K and 2GHz-6GHz. Both periodic and non-periodic response as a function of applied RF field amplitude are observed. We attribute these features to extrinsic and intrinsic nonlinear responses of the sample. The RF-current-biased Resistively Shunted Junction (RSJ) model can account for the periodic response and fits very well to the data using reasonable parameters. The non-periodic response is consistent with vortex semi-loops penetrating into the bulk of the sample once sufficiently high RF magnetic field is applied, and the data can be fit to a Time-Dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) model of this process. The fact that these responses are measured on a wide variety of Nb samples suggests that we have captured the generic nonlinear response of air-exposed Nb surfaces.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9.18Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers