Geometric Scaling of Two-Level-System Loss in Superconducting Resonators
David Niepce, Jonathan Burnett, Martí Gutierrez Latorre, Jonas Bylander
arXiv:1908.02606 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/ab6179 · 2019-08-07 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We perform an experimental and numerical study of dielectric loss in superconducting microwave resonators at low temperature. Dielectric loss, due to two-level systems, is a limiting factor in several applications, e.g. superconducting qubits, Josephson parametric amplifiers, microwave kinetic-inductance detectors, and superconducting single-photon detectors. Our devices are made of disordered NbN, which, due to magnetic-field penetration, necessitates 3D finite-element simulation of the Maxwell--London equations at microwave frequencies to accurately model the current density and electric field distribution. From the field distribution, we compute the geometric filling factors of the lossy regions in our resonator structures and fit the experimental data to determine the intrinsic loss tangents of its interfaces and dielectrics. We emphasise that the loss caused by a spin-on-glass resist such as hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ), used for ultrahigh lithographic resolution relevant to the fabrication of nanowires, and find that, when used, HSQ is the dominant source of loss, with a loss tangent of $δ^i_{HSQ} = 8 \times 10^{-3}$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.2 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
Similar papers
Fluctuation Spectroscopy of Two-Level Systems in Superconducting Resonators
similarity 0.89J. H. Béjanin et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.07445
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superfluid Stiffness and Flat-Band Superconductivity in Magic-Angle Graphene Probed by cQED
similarity 0.89Miuko Tanaka et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.13740
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Surface participation and dielectric loss in superconducting qubits
similarity 0.89Chen Wang et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1509.01854
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Kinetic inductance in superconducting CoSi coplanar microwave transmission lines
similarity 0.89Ekaterina Mukhanova et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.14624
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Qubit-compatible substrates with superconducting through-silicon vias
similarity 0.89K. Grigoras et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.10425
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reduced frequency noise in superconducting resonators
similarity 0.88Barends, R. et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1005.5394
Source status unknown — claims are unverified