Geometric driving of two-level quantum systems
Zu-Jian Ying, Paola Gentile, José Pablo Baltanàs, Diego Frustaglia, Carmine Ortix, Mario Cuoco
arXiv:1909.04291 · DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVRESEARCH.2.023167 · 2019-09-10 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate a class of cyclic evolutions for %the cyclic evolution of driven two-level quantum systems (effective spin-1/2) with a particular focus on the geometric characteristics of the driving and their specific imprints on the quantum dynamics. By introducing the concept of geometric field curvature for any field trajectory in the parameter space we are able to unveil underlying patterns in the overall quantum behavior: the knowledge of the field curvature provides a non-standard and fresh access to the interrelation between field and spin trajectories, and the corresponding quantum phases acquired in non-adiabatic cyclic evolutions. In this context, we single out setups in which the driving field curvature can be employed to demonstrate a pure geometric control of the quantum phases. Furthermore, the driving field curvature can be naturally exploited to introduce the geometrical torque and derive a general expression for the total quantum phase acquired in a cycle. Remarkably, such relation allows to access the mechanisms controlling the changeover of the quantum phase across a topological transition and to disentangle the role of the spin and field topological windings. As for implementations, we discuss a series of physical systems and platforms to demonstrate how the geometric control of the quantum phases can be realized for pendular field drivings. This includes setups based on superconducting islands coupled to a Josephson junction and inversion asymmetric nanochannels with suitably tailored geometric shapes.
Similar papers
Physics of the Majorana-superconducting qubit hybrids
similarity 0.89D. B. Karki et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.08758
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Current-driven motion of magnetic topological defects in ferromagnetic superconductors
similarity 0.88Se Kwon Kim & Suk Bum Chung · 2023 · arXiv:2305.13564
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Berry phase and spin quantum Hall effect in the vortex state of superfluid He3 in two dimensions
similarity 0.88Jun Goryo & Mahito Kohmoto · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0206226
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fast and accurate Cooper pair pump
similarity 0.87Paolo Andrea Erdman et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1909.13627
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Geometric phases in superconducting qubits beyond the two-level-approximation
similarity 0.87Berger, S. et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1204.1278
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Measurement of coherent charge transfer in an adiabatic Cooper pair pump
similarity 0.87Rosario Fazio et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0302383
Source status unknown — claims are unverified