← Back to search

Thermodynamic Evidence for a Two-Component Superconducting Order Parameter in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$

Sayak Ghosh, Arkady Shekhter, F. Jerzembeck, N. Kikugawa, Dmitry A. Sokolov, Manuel Brando, A. P. Mackenzie, Clifford W. Hicks, B. J. Ramshaw

arXiv:2002.06130 · DOI 10.1038/s41567-020-1032-4 · 2020-02-14 · Nature Physics

T1theoretical171 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ has stood as the leading candidate for a spin-triplet superconductor for 26 years. Recent NMR experiments have cast doubt on this candidacy, however, and it is difficult to find a theory of superconductivity that is consistent with all experiments. What is needed are symmetry-based experiments that can rule out broad classes of possible superconducting order parameters. Here we use resonant ultrasound spectroscopy to measure the entire symmetry-resolved elastic tensor of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ through the superconducting transition. We observe a thermodynamic discontinuity in the shear elastic modulus $c_{66}$, requiring that the superconducting order parameter is two-component. A two-component $p$-wave order parameter, such as $p_x+i p_y$, naturally satisfies this requirement. As this order parameter appears to be precluded by recent NMR experiments, we suggest that two other two-component order parameters, namely $\left\{d_{xz},d_{yz}\right\}$ or $\left\{d_{x^2-y^2},g_{xy(x^2-y^2)}\right\}$, are now the prime candidates for the order parameter of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers