Role of nematicity in controlling spin fluctuations and superconducting Tc in bulk FeSe
Swagata Acharya, Dimitar Pashov, Mark van Schilfgaarde
arXiv:2005.07729 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.144507 · 2020-05-15 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
FeSe undergoes a transition from a tetragonal to a slightly orthorhombic phase at 90\,K, and becomes a superconductor below 8\,K. The orthorhombic phase is sometimes called a nematic phase because quantum oscillation, neutron, and other measurements detect a significant asymmetry in $x$ and $y$. How nematicity affects superconductivity has recently become a matter of intense speculation. Here we employ an advanced \emph{ab-initio} Green's function description of superconductivity and show that bulk tetragonal FeSe would, in principle, superconduct with almost the same T$_{c}$ as the nematic phase. The mechanism driving the observed nematicity is not yet understood. Since the present theory underestimates nematicity, we simulate the full nematic asymmetry by artificially enhancing the orthorhombic distortion. For benchmarking, we compare theoretical spin susceptibilities against experimentally observed data over all energies and relevant momenta. When the orthorhombic distortion is adjusted to correlate with observed nematicity in spin susceptibility, the enhanced nematicity causes spectral weight redistribution in the Fe-3d$_{xz}$ and d$_{yz}$ orbitals, but it leads to at most 10-15$\%$ increment in T$_{c}$. This is because the d$_{xy}$ orbital always remains the most strongly correlated and provides most of the source of the superconducting glue. Nematicity suppresses the density of states at Fermi level; nevertheless T$_{c}$ increases, in contradiction to both BCS and BEC theories. We show how the increase is connected to the structure of the particle-particle vertex. Our results suggest while nematicity may be intrinsic property of bulk FeSe, is not the primary force driving the superconducting pairing.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Role of nematicity in controlling spin fluctuations and superconducting Tc in bulk FeSe
similarity 0.93Swagata Acharya et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Feedback of non-local nematicity on the magnetic anisotropy in FeSe
similarity 0.91Steffen Bötzel & Ilya M. Eremin · 2022 · arXiv:2205.07718
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Sixfold enhancement of superconductivity in a tunable electronic nematic system
similarity 0.91Chris Eckberg et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.00986
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unveiling the hidden nematicity and spin subsystem in FeSe
similarity 0.91C. W. Luo et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1603.08710
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Temperature Superconductivity in Iron Pnictides and Chalcogenides
similarity 0.91Qimiao Si et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1604.03566
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity-enhanced Nematicity and '' Gap Symmetry in Fe(SeS)
similarity 0.91Liran Wang et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1607.01288
Source status unknown — claims are unverified