Gate-controlled Suspended Titanium Nanobridge Supercurrent Transistor
M. Rocci, G. De Simoni, C. Puglia, D. Degli Esposti, E. Strambini, V. Zannier, L. Sorba, F. Giazotto
arXiv:2006.07091 · DOI 10.1021/acsnano.0c05355 · 2020-06-12 · ACS nano
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In a family of experiments carried on all-metallic supercurrent nano-transistors a surprising gating effect has been recently shown. These include the full suppression of the critical supercurrent, the increase of quasiparticle population, the manipulation of the superconducting phase, and the broadening of the switching current distributions. Aside from the high potential for future applications, these findings raised fundamental questions on the origin of these phenomena. To date, two complementary hypotheses are under debate: an electrostatically-triggered orbital polarization at the superconductor surface, or the injection of highly-energetic quasiparticles extracted from the gate. Here, we tackle this crucial issue via a fully suspended gate-controlled Ti nano-transistor. Our geometry allows to eliminate any direct injection of quasiparticles through the substrate thereby making cold electron field emission through the vacuum the only possible charge transport mechanism. With the aid of a fully numerical 3D model in combination with the observed phenomenology and thermal considerations we can rule out, with any realistic likelihood, the occurrence of cold electron field emission. Excluding these two trivial phenomena is pivotal in light of understanding the microscopic nature of gating effect in superconducting nanostructures, which represents an unsolved puzzle in contemporary superconductivity. Yet, from the technological point of view, our suspended fabrication technique provides the enabling technology to implement a variety of applications and fundamental studies combining, for instance, superconductivity with nano-mechanics.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ti Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.15 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Ti Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.28 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Ti Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Metallic supercurrent field-effect transistor
similarity 0.89G. De Simoni et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.02400
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A superinductor in a deep sub-micron integrated circuit
similarity 0.88T. H. Swift et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2507.13202
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robust poor man's Majorana zero modes using Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states
similarity 0.88Francesco Zatelli et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2311.03193
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The gate-tunable Josephson diode
similarity 0.87G. P. Mazur et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.14283
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of junction length on supercurrent resilience against magnetic field in InSb-Al nanowire Josephson junctions
similarity 0.87Vukan Levajac et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.07858
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrostatic control of the proximity effect in the bulk of semiconductor-superconductor hybrids
similarity 0.87N. van Loo et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.06709
Source status unknown — claims are unverified