Machine learning on the electron-boson mechanism in superconductors
Wan-Ju Li, Ming-Chien Hsu, Shin-Ming Huang
arXiv:2007.07512 · 2020-07-15
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
To unravel pairing mechanism of a superconductor from limited, indirect experimental data is always a difficult task. It is common but sometimes dubious to explain by a theoretical model with some tuning parameters. In this work, we propose that the machine learning might infer pairing mechanism from observables like superconducting gap functions. For superconductivity within the Migdal-Eliashberg theory, we perform supervised learning between superconducting gap functions and electron-boson spectral functions. For simple spectral functions, the neural network can easily capture the correspondence and predict perfectly. For complex spectral functions, an autoencoder is utilized to reduce the complexity of the spectral functions to be compatible to that of the gap functions. After this complexity-reduction process, relevant information of the spectral function is extracted and good performance restores. Our proposed method can extract relevant information from data and can be applied to general function-to-function mappings with asymmetric complexities either in physics or other fields.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hg Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
The unreasonable effectiveness of Eliashberg theory for pairing of non-Fermi liquids
similarity 0.89Debanjan Chowdhury & Erez Berg · 2019 · arXiv:1912.07646
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of Retardation in the Holstein-Hubbard Model: a two-site Calculation
similarity 0.88F. Marsiglio · 2022 · arXiv:2205.10352
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-consistent temperature dependence of quasiparticle bands in monolayer FeSe on SrTiO
similarity 0.88Fabian Schrodi et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.12494
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Room Temperature Superconductivity: the Roles of Theory and Materials Design
similarity 0.88Warren E. Pickett · 2022 · arXiv:2204.05930
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coupled system of electrons and exciton-polaritons: Screening, dynamical effects, and superconductivity
similarity 0.88Andrey S. Plyashechnik et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.11245
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiband strong-coupling superconductors with spontaneously broken time-reversal symmetry
similarity 0.88Niels Henrik Aase et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.15894
Source status unknown — claims are unverified