Evolution of spin excitations from bulk to monolayer FeSe
J. Pelliciari, S. Karakuzu, Q. Song, R. Arpaia, A. Nag, M. Rossi, J. Li, T. Yu, X. Chen, R. Peng, M. Garcia-Fernandez, A. C. Walters, Q. Wang, J. Zhao, G. Ghiringhelli, D. Feng, T. A. Maier, K. -J. Zhou, S. Johnston, R. Comin
arXiv:2008.09618 · DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-23317-3 · 2020-08-21
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The discovery of enhanced superconductivity (SC) in FeSe films grown on SrTiO3 (FeSe/STO) has revitalized the field of Fe-based superconductors. In the ultrathin limit, the superconducting transition temperature Tc is increased by almost an order of magnitude, raising new questions on the pairing mechanism. As in other unconventional superconductors, antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations have been proposed as a candidate to mediate SC in this system. Thus, it is essential to study the evolution of the spin dynamics of FeSe in the ultrathin limit to elucidate their relationship with superconductivity. Here, we investigate and compare the spin excitations in bulk and monolayer FeSe grown on STO using high-resolution resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) and quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) calculations. Despite the absence of long-range magnetic order, bulk FeSe displays dispersive magnetic excitations reminiscent of other Fe-pnictides. Conversely, the spin excitations in FeSe/STO are gapped, dispersionless, and significantly hardened relative to the bulk counterpart. By comparing our RIXS results with simulations of a bilayer Hubbard model, we connect the evolution of the spin excitations to the Fermiology of the two systems. The present study reveals a remarkable reconfiguration of spin excitations in FeSe/STO, which is essential to understand the role of spin fluctuations in the pairing mechanism.
Similar papers
Enhanced superconductivity in FeSe/SrTiO3 from the combination of forward scattering phonons and spin fluctuations
similarity 0.92Louk Rademaker et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic interactions in FeSe studied by first principle calculations
similarity 0.92Shuai Wang & Fa Wang · 2015 · arXiv:1510.05476
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression and revival of superconducting phase coherence in monolayer FeSe/SrTiO
similarity 0.92H. Ru et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.10744
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thickness dependence of superconductivity and superconductor-insulator transition in ultrathin FeSe films on SrTiO3(001) substrate
similarity 0.92Qingyan Wang et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1507.08431
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and Nematic Fluctuations in a model of FeSe monolayers: A Determinant Quantum Monte Carlo Study
similarity 0.92Philipp T. Dumitrescu et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1512.08523
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High temperature superconducting FeSe films on SrTiO3 substrates
similarity 0.91Yi Sun et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1404.3464
Source status unknown — claims are unverified