Superconductivity emerging from a stripe charge order in IrTe2 nanoflakes
Sungyu Park, So Young Kim, Hyoung Kug Kim, Min Jeong Kim, Hoon Kim, Gyu Seung Choi, C. J. Won, Sooran Kim, Kyoo Kim, Evgeny F. Talantsev, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Sang-Wook Cheong, B. J. Kim, H. W. Yeom, Jonghwan Kim, Tae-Hwan Kim, Jun Sung Kim
arXiv:2009.12578 · DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-23310-w · 2020-09-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductivity in the vicinity of a competing electronic order often manifests itself with a superconducting dome, centred at a presumed quantum critical point in the phase diagram. This common feature, found in many unconventional superconductors, has supported a prevalent scenario that fluctuations or partial melting of a parent order are essential for inducing or enhancing superconductivity. Here we present a contrary example, found in IrTe2 nanoflakes of which the superconducting dome is identified well inside the parent stripe charge ordering phase in the thickness-dependent phase diagram. The coexisting stripe charge order in IrTe2 nanoflakes significantly increases the out-of-plane coherence length and the coupling strength of superconductivity, in contrast to the doped bulk IrTe2. These findings clarify that the inherent instabilities of the parent stripe phaseare sufficient to induce superconductivity in IrTe2 without its complete or partial melting. Our study highlights the thickness control as an effective means to unveil intrinsic phase diagrams of correlated vdW materials.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| IrTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.35 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| IrTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Nanoscale Superconducting Honeycomb Charge Order in IrTe2
similarity 0.89Hyo Sung Kim et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.06962
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Commensurate vs incommensurate charge ordering near the superconducting dome in IrPtTe revealed by resonant x-ray scattering
similarity 0.86K. Takubo et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.05547
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
From charge- and spin-ordering to superconductivity in the organic charge-transfer solids
similarity 0.86R. T. Clay & S. Mazumdar · 2018 · arXiv:1802.01551
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression of Structural Phase Transition in IrTe2 by Isovalent Rh Doping
similarity 0.86Kazutaka Kudo et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1307.4152
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fully gapped type-II superconductivity in Pt-doped IrTe2 near critical doping
similarity 0.86Aastha Vasdev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in type-II Weyl-semimetal WTe2 induced by a normal metal contact
similarity 0.86Artem Kononov et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.04752
Source status unknown — claims are unverified