Quantum non-demolition dispersive readout of a superconducting artificial atom using large photon numbers
Daria Gusenkova, Martin Spiecker, Richard Gebauer, Madita Willsch, Francesco Valenti, Nick Karcher, Lukas Grünhaupt, Ivan Takmakov, Patrick Winkel, Dennis Rieger, Alexey V. Ustinov, Nicolas Roch, Wolfgang Wernsdorfer, Kristel Michielsen, Oliver Sander, Ioan M. Pop
arXiv:2009.14785 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.064030 · 2020-09-30 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Reading out the state of superconducting artificial atoms typically relies on dispersive coupling to a readout resonator. For a given system noise temperature, increasing the circulating photon number $\bar{n}$ in the resonator enables a shorter measurement time and is therefore expected to reduce readout errors caused by spontaneous atom transitions. However, increasing $\bar{n}$ is generally observed to also increase these transition rates. Here we present a fluxonium artificial atom in which we measure an overall flat dependence of the transition rates between its first two states as a function of $\bar{n}$, up to $\bar{n}\approx200$. Despite the fact that we observe the expected decrease of the dispersive shift with increasing readout power, the signal-to-noise ratio continuously improves with increasing $\bar{n}$. Even without the use of a parametric amplifier, at $\bar{n}=74$, we measure fidelities of 99% and 93% for feedback-assisted ground and excited state preparation, respectively.
Similar papers
Quantum Nondemolition Dispersive Readout of a Superconducting Artificial Atom Using Large Photon Numbers
similarity 0.92Daria Gusenkova et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluxonium: single Cooper pair circuit free of charge offsets
similarity 0.89Vladimir E. Manucharyan et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0906.0831
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluxon readout of a superconducting qubit
similarity 0.88Kirill G. Fedorov et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.0645
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Approaching Unit Visibility for Control of a Superconducting Qubit with Dispersive Readout
similarity 0.87A. Wallraff et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0502645
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Readout error mitigated quantum state tomography tested on superconducting qubits
similarity 0.87Adrian Skasberg Aasen et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.04211
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Active protection of a superconducting qubit with an interferometric Josephson isolator
similarity 0.87Baleegh Abdo et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1810.07234
Source status unknown — claims are unverified