Readout error mitigated quantum state tomography tested on superconducting qubits
Adrian Skasberg Aasen, Andras Di Giovanni, Hannes Rotzinger, Alexey V. Ustinov, Martin Gärttner
arXiv:2312.04211 · DOI 10.1038/s42005-024-01790-8 · 2023-12-07 · Communications Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quantum technologies rely heavily on accurate control and reliable readout of quantum systems. Current experiments are limited by numerous sources of noise that can only be partially captured by simple analytical models and additional characterization of the noise sources is required. We test the ability of readout error mitigation to correct realistic noise found in systems composed of quantum two-level objects (qubits). To probe the limit of such methods, we designed a beyond-classical readout error mitigation protocol based on quantum state tomography (QST), which estimates the density matrix of a quantum system, and quantum detector tomography (QDT), which characterizes the measurement procedure. By treating readout error mitigation in the context of state tomography the method becomes largely readout mode-, architecture-, noise source-, and quantum state-independent. We implement this method on a superconducting qubit and evaluate the increase in reconstruction fidelity for QST. We characterize the performance of the method by varying important noise sources, such as suboptimal readout signal amplification, insufficient resonator photon population, off-resonant qubit drive, and effectively shortened $T_1$ and $T_2$ decay times. As a result, we identified noise sources for which readout error mitigation worked well, and observed decreases in readout infidelity by a factor of up to 30.
Similar papers
Dispersive Qubit Readout with Intrinsic Resonator Reset
similarity 0.91M. Jerger et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.04891
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mitigation of interfacial dielectric loss in aluminum-on-silicon superconducting qubits
similarity 0.90Janka Biznárová et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.06797
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Digital coherent control of a superconducting qubit
similarity 0.90Edward Leonard et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.07930
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Improving the accuracy of circuit quantization using the electromagnetic properties of superconductors
similarity 0.89Seong Hyeon Park et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.24004
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-consistent surface superconductivity in time-reversal symmetric Weyl semimetals
similarity 0.89Mattia Trama et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.05381
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Titanium Nitride Film on Sapphire Substrate with Low Dielectric Loss for Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.89Hao Deng et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.03528
Source status unknown — claims are unverified