Learning to extrapolate using continued fractions: Predicting the critical temperature of superconductor materials
Pablo Moscato, Mohammad Nazmul Haque, Kevin Huang, Julia Sloan, Jon C. de Oliveira
arXiv:2012.03774 · DOI 10.3390/a16080382 · 2020-11-27 · Algorithms
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), the approximation of unknown target functions $y=f(\mathbf{x})$ using limited instances $S={(\mathbf{x^{(i)}},y^{(i)})}$, where $\mathbf{x^{(i)}} \in D$ and $D$ represents the domain of interest, is a common objective. We refer to $S$ as the training set and aim to identify a low-complexity mathematical model that can effectively approximate this target function for new instances $\mathbf{x}$. Consequently, the model's generalization ability is evaluated on a separate set $T=\{\mathbf{x^{(j)}}\} \subset D$, where $T \neq S$, frequently with $T \cap S = \emptyset$, to assess its performance beyond the training set. However, certain applications require accurate approximation not only within the original domain $D$ but also in an extended domain $D'$ that encompasses $D$. This becomes particularly relevant in scenarios involving the design of new structures, where minimizing errors in approximations is crucial. For example, when developing new materials through data-driven approaches, the AI/ML system can provide valuable insights to guide the design process by serving as a surrogate function. Consequently, the learned model can be employed to facilitate the design of new laboratory experiments. In this paper, we propose a method for multivariate regression based on iterative fitting of a continued fraction, incorporating additive spline models. We compare the performance of our method with established techniques, including AdaBoost, Kernel Ridge, Linear Regression, Lasso Lars, Linear Support Vector Regression, Multi-Layer Perceptrons, Random Forests, Stochastic Gradient Descent, and XGBoost. To evaluate these methods, we focus on an important problem in the field: predicting the critical temperature of superconductors based on physical-chemical characteristics.
Similar papers
3DSC - A New Dataset of Superconductors Including Crystal Structures
similarity 0.90Timo Sommer et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.06071
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Large Language Models for Superconductor Discovery
similarity 0.88Suman Itani et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.10847
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Machine-learning approach for discovery of conventional superconductors
similarity 0.87Huan Tran & Tuoc N. Vu
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Prediction of superconducting properties of materials based on machine learning models
similarity 0.87Jie Hu et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.03075
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Machine learning using structural representations for discovery of high temperature superconductors
similarity 0.87Lazar Novakovic et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.10474
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum criticality at the superconductor to insulator transition revealed by specific heat measurements
similarity 0.86Shachaf Poran et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.07954
Source status unknown — claims are unverified