Large Language Models for Superconductor Discovery
Suman Itani, Yibo Zhang, Ranjit Itani, Jiadong Zang
arXiv:2512.10847 · DOI 10.1016/j.jmmm.2026.174189 · 2025-12-11 · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for automated data extraction and property prediction across materials science, yet their use in superconductivity research remains limited. Here we construct a large experimental database of 78,203 records, covering 19,058 unique compositions, extracted from scientific literature using an LLM-driven workflow. Each entry includes chemical composition, critical temperature, measurement pressure, structural descriptors, and critical fields. We fine-tune several open-source LLMs for three tasks: (i) classifying superconductors vs. non-superconductors, (ii) predicting the superconducting transition temperature directly from composition or structure-informed inputs, and (iii) inverse design of candidate compositions conditioned on target Tc. The fine-tuned LLMs achieve performance comparable to traditional feature-based models and in some cases exceed them, while substantially outperforming their base versions and capturing meaningful chemical and structural trends. The inverse-design model generates chemically plausible compositions, including 28% novel candidates not seen in training. Finally, applying the trained predictors to the GNoME database identifies unreported materials with predicted Tc > 10 K. Although unverified, these candidates illustrate how integrating an LLM-driven workflow can enable scalable hypothesis generation for superconductivity discovery.
Similar papers
Towards high-throughput superconductor discovery via machine learning
similarity 0.89Stephen R. Xie et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2104.11150
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Accelerating the Search for Superconductors Using Machine Learning
similarity 0.88Suhas Adiga & Umesh V. Waghmare · 2025 · arXiv:2505.11964
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Machine learning modeling of superconducting critical temperature
similarity 0.88Valentin Stanev et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.02727
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
New approach to theory of tunneling spectroscopy in unconventional superconductors
similarity 0.87A. V. Burmistrova et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1210.1479
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of the signatures of sub-resolution defects in two-dimensional superconductors with scanning SQUID
similarity 0.87Hilary Noad et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.00617
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Composition-Based Machine Learning for Screening Superconducting Ternary Hydrides from a Curated Dataset
similarity 0.87Kazuaki Tokuyama et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.20228
Source status unknown — claims are unverified