Accelerating the Search for Superconductors Using Machine Learning
Suhas Adiga, Umesh V. Waghmare
arXiv:2505.11964 · 2025-05-17
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Prediction of critical temperature $(T_c)$ of a superconductor remains a significant challenge in condensed matter physics. While the BCS theory explains superconductivity in conventional superconductors, there is no framework to predict $T_c$ of unconventional, higher $T_{c}$ superconductors. Quantum Structure Diagrams (QSD) were successful in establishing structure-property relationship for superconductors, quasicrystals, and ferroelectric materials starting from chemical composition. Building on the QSD ideas, we demonstrate that the principal component analysis of superconductivity data uncovers the clustering of various classes of superconductors. We use machine learning analysis and cleaned databases of superconductors to develop predictive models of $T_c$ of a superconductor using its chemical composition. Earlier studies relied on datasets with inconsistencies, leading to suboptimal predictions. To address this, we introduce a data-cleaning workflow to enhance the statistical quality of superconducting databases by eliminating redundancies and resolving inconsistencies. With this improvised database, we apply a supervised machine learning framework and develop a Random Forest model to predict superconductivity and $T_c$ as a function of descriptors motivated from Quantum Structure Diagrams. We demonstrate that this model generalizes effectively in reasonably accurate prediction of $T_{c}$ of compounds outside the database. We further employ our model to systematically screen materials across materials databases as well as various chemically plausible combinations of elements and predict $\mathrm{Tl}_{5}\mathrm{Ba}_{6}\mathrm{Ca}_{6}\mathrm{Cu}_{9}\mathrm{O}_{29}$ to exhibit superconductivity with a $T_{c}$ $\sim$ 105 K. Being based on the descriptors used in QSD's, our model bypasses structural information and predicts $T_{c}$ merely from the chemical composition.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tl5Ba6Ca6Cu9O29 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 105 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Hg Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| LaH10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 260 | 190 GPa | unknown |
| C6Yb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| V3Si Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| CeH9 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 39 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
Similar papers
Towards high-throughput superconductor discovery via machine learning
similarity 0.93Stephen R. Xie et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2104.11150
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Large Language Models for Superconductor Discovery
similarity 0.90Suman Itani et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.10847
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical Temperature Prediction for a Superconductor: A Variational Bayesian Neural Network Approach
similarity 0.90Thanh Dung Le et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2002.04977
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revealing intrinsic vortex-core states in Fe-based superconductors through machine-learning-driven discovery
similarity 0.89Yueming Guo et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.09337
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Deep Learning Model for Finding New Superconductors
similarity 0.89Tomohiko Konno et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1812.01995
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of the signatures of sub-resolution defects in two-dimensional superconductors with scanning SQUID
similarity 0.89Hilary Noad et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.00617
Source status unknown — claims are unverified