Reservoir Computing with Superconducting Electronics
Graham E. Rowlands, Minh-Hai Nguyen, Guilhem J. Ribeill, Andrew P. Wagner, Luke C. G. Govia, Wendson A. S. Barbosa, Daniel J. Gauthier, Thomas A. Ohki
arXiv:2103.02522 · 2021-03-03 · ArXiv
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The rapidity and low power consumption of superconducting electronics makes them an ideal substrate for physical reservoir computing, which commandeers the computational power inherent to the evolution of a dynamical system for the purposes of performing machine learning tasks. We focus on a subset of superconducting circuits that exhibit soliton-like dynamics in simple transmission line geometries. With numerical simulations we demonstrate the effectiveness of these circuits in performing higher-order parity calculations and channel equalization at rates approaching 100 Gb/s. The availability of a proven superconducting logic scheme considerably simplifies the path to a fully integrated reservoir computing platform and makes superconducting reservoirs an enticing substrate for high rate signal processing applications.
Similar papers
Low-power Rapid Planar Superconducting Logic Devices
similarity 0.84Nikolay Gusarov et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.18309
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scalable Superconductor Neuron with Ternary Synaptic Connections for Ultra-Fast SNN Hardware
similarity 0.83Mustafa Altay Karamuftuoglu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.16384
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pattern recognition with superconducting wirelet neurons
similarity 0.83Khalil Harrabi et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2602.14330
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Superconducting Nanowire-based Architecture for Neuromorphic Computing
similarity 0.83Andres E. Lombo et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.08928
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamics of Josephson junctions and single-flux-quantum networks with superconductor–insulator–normal-metal junction shunts
similarity 0.83A. B. Zorin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting-qubit readout using next-generation reservoir computing
similarity 0.83Robert Kent et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified