The Josephson-Anderson Relation and the Classical D'Alembert Paradox
Gregory L. Eyink
arXiv:2103.15177 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031054 · 2021-03-28 · Physical Review X
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Generalizing prior work of P. W. Anderson and E. R. Huggins, we show that a "detailed Josephson-Anderson relation" holds for drag on a finite body held at rest in a classical incompressible fluid flowing with velocity ${\bf V}.$ The relation asserts an exact equality between the instantaneous power consumption by the drag, $-{\bf F}\cdot{\bf V},$ and the vorticity flux across the potential mass current, $-(1/2)\int dJ\int ε_{ijk}Σ_{ij}\,d\ell_k.$ Here $Σ_{ij}$ is the flux in the $i$th coordinate direction of the conserved $j$th component of vorticity and the line-integrals over $\ell$ are taken along streamlines of the potential flow solution ${\bf u}_φ=\nablaφ$ of the ideal Euler equation, carrying mass flux $dJ=ρ\,{\bf u}_φ\cdot d{\bf A}.$ The results generalize the theories of M. J. Lighthill for flow past a body and, in particular, the steady-state relation $(1/2)ε_{ijk}\langleΣ_{jk}\rangle =\partial_i\langle h\rangle,$ where $h=p+(1/2)|{\bf u}|^2$ is the generalized enthalpy or total pressure, extends Lighthill's theory of vorticity generation at solid walls into the interior of the flow. We use these results to explain drag on the body in terms of vortex dynamics, unifying the theories for classical fluids and for quantum superfluids. The results offer a new solution to the "D'Alembert paradox" at infinite Reynolds numbers and imply the necessary conditions for turbulent drag reduction.
Similar papers
Josephson-Anderson Relation and the Classical D’Alembert Paradox
similarity 0.90Gregory L. Eyink
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Onsager Theory of Turbulence, the Josephson-Anderson Relation, and the D'Alembert Paradox
similarity 0.85Hao Quan & Gregory L. Eyink · 2022 · arXiv:2206.05326
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson-Anderson relation as diagnostic of turbulent drag reduction by polymers
similarity 0.84Samvit Kumar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stochastic Lagrangian Dynamics of Vorticity. I. General Theory
similarity 0.84Gregory L. Eyink et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.06677
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of the Josephson-Anderson relation in experiments on hydrodynamic drag
similarity 0.84Nicola Savelli et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Turbulent Flow in Pipes and Channels as Cross-Stream "Inverse Cascades" of Vorticity
similarity 0.83Gregory L. Eyink · 2008 · arXiv:0809.1165
Source status unknown — claims are unverified