Turbulent Flow in Pipes and Channels as Cross-Stream "Inverse Cascades" of Vorticity
Gregory L. Eyink
arXiv:0809.1165 · DOI 10.1063/1.3013635 · 2008-09-06 · Physics of Fluids
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A commonplace view of pressure-driven turbulence in pipes and channels is as "cascades" of streamwise momentum toward the viscous layer at the wall. We present in this paper an alternative picture of these flows as "inverse cascades" of spanwise vorticity, in the cross-stream direction but away from the viscous sublayer. We show that there is a constant spatial flux of spanwise vorticity, due to vorticity conservation, and that this flux is necessary to produce pressure-drop and energy dissipation. The vorticity transport is shown to be dominated by viscous diffusion at distances closer to the wall than the peak Reynolds stress, well into the classical log-layer. The Perry-Chong model based on "representative" hairpin/horsehoe vortices predicts a single sign of the turbulent vorticity flux over the whole log-layer, whereas the actual flux must change sign at the location of the Reynolds-stress maximum. Sign-reversal may be achieved by assuming a slow power-law decay of the Townsend "eddy intensity function" for wall-normal distances greater than the hairpin length-scale. The vortex-cascade picture presented here has a close analogue in the theory of quantum superfluids and superconductors, the "phase slippage" of quantized vortex lines. Most of our results should therefore apply as well to superfluid turbulence in pipes and channels. We also discuss issues about drag-reduction from this perspective.
Similar papers
The Josephson-Anderson Relation and the Classical D'Alembert Paradox
similarity 0.84Gregory L. Eyink · 2021 · arXiv:2103.15177
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stochastic Lagrangian Dynamics of Vorticity. I. General Theory
similarity 0.84Gregory L. Eyink et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.06677
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex dynamics in superconducting channels with periodic constrictions
similarity 0.84K. Yu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Onsager Theory of Turbulence, the Josephson-Anderson Relation, and the D'Alembert Paradox
similarity 0.83Hao Quan & Gregory L. Eyink · 2022 · arXiv:2206.05326
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Variational description of multi-fluid hydrodynamics: Coupling to gauge fields
similarity 0.83Reinhard Prix · 2005 · arXiv:physics/0503217
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex Physics in Confined Geometries
similarity 0.83M. Cristina Marchetti & David R. Nelson · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9909382
Source status unknown — claims are unverified