Fully-staggered-array bulk Re-Ba-Cu-O short-period undulator: large-scale 3D electromagnetic modelling and design optimization using A-V and H-formulation methods
Kai Zhang, Mark Ainslie, Marco Calvi, Ryota Kinjo, Thomas Schmidt
arXiv:2105.01761 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/ac1c14 · 2021-05-04 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The development of a new hard x-ray beamline I-TOMCAT equipped with a 1-meter-long short-period bulk high-temperature superconductor undulator (BHTSU) has been scheduled for the upgrade of the Swiss Light Source (SLS 2.0) at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI). The very hard x-ray source generated by the BHTSU will increase the brilliance at the beamline by over one order of magnitude in comparison to other state-of-the-art undulator technologies and allow experiments to be carried out with photon energies in excess of 60 keV. One of the key challenges for designing a 1-meter-long (100 periods) BHTSU is the large-scale simulation of the magnetization currents inside 200 staggered-array bulk superconductors. A feasible approach to simplify the electromagnetic model is to retain five periods from both ends of the 1-meter-long BHTSU, reducing the number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) to the scale of millions. In this paper, the theory of the recently-proposed 2D A-V formulation-based backward computation method is extended to calculate the critical state magnetization currents in the ten-period staggered-array BHTSU in 3D. The simulation results of the magnetization currents and the associated undulator field along the electron beam axis are compared with the well-known 3D H-formulation and the highly efficient 3D H-φ formulation method, all methods showing excellent agreement with each other as well as with experimental results. The mixed H-φ formulation avoids computing the eddy currents in the air subdomain and is significantly faster than the full H-formulation method, but is slower in comparison to the A-V formulation-based backward computation. Finally, the fastest and the most efficient A-V formulation in ANSYS 2020R1 Academic is adopted to optimize the integrals of the undulator field along the electron beam axis by optimizing the sizes of the end bulks.
Similar papers
Fast and efficient critical state modelling of field-cooled bulk high-temperature superconductors using a backward computation method
similarity 0.86Kai Zhang et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.06385
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic property of a staggered-array undulator using a bulk high-temperature superconductor
similarity 0.85Ryota Kinjo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Breakthrough in field amplitude of high-temperature superconductors staggered-array undulators
similarity 0.83Ryota Kinjo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental results of a YBCO bulk superconducting undulator magnetic optimization
similarity 0.83Marco Calvi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
GdBCO bulk superconducting helical undulator for x-ray free-electron lasers
similarity 0.82Marco Calvi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Efficient modeling of high temperature superconductors surrounded by magnetic components using a reduced H- formulation
similarity 0.82Alexandre Arsenault et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2104.05582
Source status unknown — claims are unverified