← Back to search

Long-range interaction of magnetic moments in a coupled system of S/F/S Josephson junctions with anomalous ground-state phase shift

G. A. Bobkov, I. V. Bobkova, A. M. Bobkov

arXiv:2105.05780 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.024513 · 2021-05-12 · Physical Review B

T39 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

A mechanism of a superconductivity-mediated interaction of two magnets in a system of coupled superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor (S/F/S) Josephson junctions (JJs) with spin-orbit interaction is proposed. The predicted indirect magnetic interaction favors the antiparallel orientation of the magnets. Its spatial scale is not restricted by the proximity length scales of the superconductor. Our estimates suggest that the interaction strength is not reduced considerably even at the macroscopic scales of the order of millimeters. At larger distances $l$ between the magnets the coupling constant exhibits the long-range power law $1/l$ behavior. The mechanism of the interaction is based on two key ingredients: (i) the anomalous ground state phase shift in the S/F/S JJ provides a magnetoelectric coupling between the condensate phase and the magnetization and (ii) the interaction is mediated by the condensate phase of the superconducting region connecting both JJs. In addition we demonstrate high tunability of the total magnetic configuration of the system by the externally controlled superconducting phase between the leads.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

10Pressure not reportedunknown
Al

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.8Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers