Low-density superconductivity in SrTiO$_3$ bounded by the adiabatic criterion
Hyeok Yoon, Adrian G. Swartz, Shannon P. Harvey, Hisashi Inoue, Yasuyuki Hikita, Yue Yu, Suk Bum Chung, Srinivas Raghu, Harold Y. Hwang
arXiv:2106.10802 · 2021-06-21
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
SrTiO$_3$ exhibits superconductivity for carrier densities $10^{19}-10^{21}$ cm$^{-3}$. Across this range, the Fermi level traverses a number of vibrational modes in the system, making it ideal for studying dilute superconductivity. We use high-resolution planar-tunneling spectroscopy to probe chemically-doped SrTiO$_3$ across the superconducting dome. The over-doped superconducting boundary aligns, with surprising precision, to the Fermi energy crossing the Debye energy. Superconductivity emerges with decreasing density, maintaining throughout the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) gap to transition-temperature ratio, despite being in the anti-adiabatic regime. At lowest superconducting densities, the lone remaining adiabatic phonon van Hove singularity is the soft transverse-optic mode, associated with the ferroelectric instability. We suggest a scenario for pairing mediated by this mode in the presence of spin-orbit coupling, which naturally accounts for the superconducting dome and BCS ratio.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| SrTiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SrTiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| K3C60 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Rb3C60 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YPdBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LuPdBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity and strong interactions in a tunable moiré quasiperiodic crystal
similarity 0.95Aviram Uri et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.00686
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport anomalies in multiband superconductors near quantum critical point
similarity 0.94Maxim Dzero et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.05791
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic spin susceptibility in metallic strontium titanate
similarity 0.94A. Najev et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.17558
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of nematic instability and dominant response in the kagome metal CsVSb
similarity 0.94Zhaoyu Liu et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.14574
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Characterizing two-dimensional superconductivity via nanoscale noise magnetometry with single-spin qubits
similarity 0.94Pavel E. Dolgirev et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.05283
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electromagnetic Response of Superconducting RF Cavities
similarity 0.94Hikaru Ueki et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.11752
Source status unknown — claims are unverified