Modelling the transfer function of two-dimensional SQUID and SQIF arrays with thermal noise
Marc A. Gali Labarias, Karl-H. Muller, Emma E. Mitchell
arXiv:2106.11439 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.064009 · 2021-06-21 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a theoretical model for 2D SQUID and SQIF arrays with over-damped Josephson junctions for uniform bias current injection at 77 K. Our simulations demonstrate the importance of including Johnson thermal noise and reveal that the mutual inductive coupling between SQUID loops is of minor importance. Our numerical results establish the validity of a simple scaling behaviour between the voltages of 1D and 2D SQUID arrays and show that the same scaling behaviour applies to the maximum transfer functions. The maximum transfer function of a 2D SQUID array can be further optimised by applying the optimal bias current which depends on the SQUID loop self-inductance and the junction critical current. Our investigation further reveals that a scaling behaviour exits between the maximum transfer function of a 2D SQUID array and that of a single dc-SQUID. Finally, we investigate the voltage response of 1D and 2D SQIF arrays and illustrate the effects of adding spreads in the heights and widths of SQUID loops.
Similar papers
Modeling the Transfer Function of Two-Dimensional SQUID and SQIF Arrays with Thermal Noise
similarity 0.94M.A. Galí Labarias et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Kinetic inductance and voltage response dependence on temperature: Asymmetric dc SQUID case study
similarity 0.90M. A. Gali Labarias et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.01505
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The role of coupling radius in 1D and 2D SQUID and SQIF arrays
similarity 0.90Marc A. Gali Labarias et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2108.11059
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Numerical study of SQUID array responses due to asymmetric junction parameters
similarity 0.90M. A. Gali Labarias & E. E. Mitchell · 2022 · arXiv:2211.13833
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The effect of bias current configuration on the performance of SQUID arrays
similarity 0.90M. A. Gali Labarias et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.05609
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Noise scaling in SQUID arrays
similarity 0.89Oscar A. Nieves & Karl-H Müller · 2024 · arXiv:2409.19837
Source status unknown — claims are unverified