The role of coupling radius in 1D and 2D SQUID and SQIF arrays
Marc A. Gali Labarias, Karl-H. Muller, Emma E. Mitchell
arXiv:2108.11059 · DOI 10.1109/TASC.2021.3133202 · 2021-08-25 · IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate theoretically the effect of the coupling radius on the transfer function in 1D and 2D SQUID arrays with different number of Josephson junctions in parallel and series at 77 K. Our results show a plateauing of the array maximum transfer function with the number of junctions in parallel. The plateauing defines the array coupling radius which we show increases with decreasing the normalised impedance of the SQUID loop inductance. The coupling radius is found to be independent of the number of junctions in series. Finally, we investigate the voltage versus magnetic field response and maximum transfer function of one 1D and two 2D SQIF arrays with different SQUID loop area distributions.
Similar papers
Modelling the transfer function of two-dimensional SQUID and SQIF arrays with thermal noise
similarity 0.90Marc A. Gali Labarias et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.11439
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of junction critical current disorder in superconducting quantum interference filter arrays
similarity 0.89K. -H. Müller & E. E. Mitchell · 2024 · arXiv:2402.09093
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Numerical study of SQUID array responses due to asymmetric junction parameters
similarity 0.89M. A. Gali Labarias & E. E. Mitchell · 2022 · arXiv:2211.13833
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A theoretical model for parallel SQUID arrays with fluxoid focussing
similarity 0.89K. -H. Müller & E. E. Mitchell · 2020 · arXiv:2009.05338
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The effect of bias current configuration on the performance of SQUID arrays
similarity 0.88M. A. Gali Labarias et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.05609
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Noise scaling in SQUID arrays
similarity 0.88Oscar A. Nieves & Karl-H Müller · 2024 · arXiv:2409.19837
Source status unknown — claims are unverified