COMSOL implementation of the H-$φ$-formulation with thin cuts for modeling superconductors with transport currents
Alexandre Arsenault, Bruno de Sousa Alves, Frédéric Sirois
arXiv:2107.04623 · DOI 10.1109/TASC.2021.3097245 · 2021-07-09 · IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Despite the acclaimed success of the magnetic field (H) formulation for modeling the electromagnetic behavior of superconductors with the finite element method, the use of vector-dependent variables in non-conducting domains leads to unnecessarily long computation times. In order to solve this issue, we have recently shown how to use a magnetic scalar potential together with the H-formulation in the COMSOL Multiphysics environment to efficiently and accurately solve for the magnetic field surrounding superconducting domains. However, from the definition of the magnetic scalar potential, the non-conducting domains must be made simply connected in order to obey Ampere's law. In this work, we use thin cuts to apply a discontinuity in $φ$ and make the non-conducting domains simply connected. This approach is shown to be easily implementable in the COMSOL Multiphysics finite element program, already widely used by the applied superconductivity community. We simulate three different models in 2-D and 3-D using superconducting filaments and tapes, and show that the results are in very good agreement with the H-A and H-formulations. Finally, we compare the computation times between the formulations, showing that the H-$φ$-formulation can be up to seven times faster than the standard H-formulation in certain applications of interest.
Similar papers
Correlation between normal and superconducting states within the Fermi-liquid region of the phase diagram of quantum-critical heavy-Fermion superconductors
similarity 0.94M. ElMassalami et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2109.14032
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Signatures of the order parameter of a superconducting adatom layer in magnetic field dependent quasiparticle interference
similarity 0.93B. A. Levitan et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.13584
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nanobridge SQUIDs as multilevel memory elements
similarity 0.93Davi A. D. Chaves et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.08050
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Generalization of interlayer tunneling models to cuprate superconductors with charge density waves
similarity 0.93Hércules Santana & E. V. L. de Mello · 2022 · arXiv:2211.07370
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport features of a topological superconducting nanowire with a quantum dot: conductance and noise
similarity 0.92Leonel Gruñeiro et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.02040
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic superconductivity
similarity 0.92David Möckli & Murilo Kessler de Azambuja · 2024 · arXiv:2405.12298
Source status unknown — claims are unverified