← Back to search

Interplay between magnetism and superconductivity in UTe2

Di S. Wei, David Saykin, Oliver Y. Miller, Sheng Ran, Shanta R. Saha, Daniel F. Agterberg, Joerg Schmalian, Nicholas P. Butch, Johnpierre Paglione, Aharon Kapitulnik

arXiv:2108.09838 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.024521 · 2021-08-22 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical26 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Time-reversal symmetry breaking (TRSB) in UTe2 was inferred from observations of a spontaneous Kerr response in the superconducting state after cooling in zero magnetic field, while a finite c-axis magnetic field training was further used to determine the nature of the non-unitary composite order-parameter of this material. Here we present an extensive study of the magnetic-field-trained Kerr effect, which unveils a unique critical state of pinned ferromagnetic vortices. We show that a remanent Kerr signal that appears following the removal of a training magnetic field, which reflects the response of the TRSB order parameter and the external magnetic field through the paramagnetic susceptibility. This unambiguously demonstrate the importance of the ferromagnetic fluctuations and their intimate relation to the composite order parameter. Focusing the measurement to the center of the sample, we are able to accurately determine the maximum field that is screened by the critical state and the respective critical current. Measurements in the presence of magnetic field show the tendency of the superconductor to produce shielding currents that oppose the increase in vortex-induced magnetization due to the diverging paramagnetic susceptibility.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
UTe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.55Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers