← Back to search

The Three-Dimensional Electronic Structure of LiFeAs: Strong-coupling Superconductivity and Topology in the Iron Pnictides

Ryan P. Day, MengXing Na, Manuel Zingl, Berend Zwartsenberg, Matteo Michiardi, Giorgio Levy, Michael Schneider, Doug Wong, Pinder Dosanjh, Tor M. Pedersen, Sergey Gorovikov, Shun Chi, Ruixing Liang, Walter N. Hardy, Douglas A. Bonn, Sergey Zhdanovich, Ilya S. Elfimov, Andrea Damascelli

arXiv:2109.13276 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.155142 · 2021-09-27 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical7 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Amongst the iron-based superconductors, LiFeAs is unrivalled in the simplicity of its crystal structure and phase diagram. However, our understanding of this canonical compound suffers from conflict between mutually incompatible descriptions of the material's electronic structure, as derived from contradictory interpretations of the photoemission record. Here, we explore the challenge of interpretation in such experiments. By combining comprehensive photon energy- and polarization- dependent angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements with numerical simulations, we establish the providence of several contradictions in the present understanding of this and related materials. We identify a confluence of surface-related issues which have precluded unambiguous identification of both the number and dimensionality of the Fermi surface sheets. Ultimately, we arrive at a scenario which supports indications of topologically non-trivial states, while also being incompatible with superconductivity as a spin-fluctuation driven Fermi surface instability.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
LiFeAs

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

18Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers