← Back to search

Bi kagome sublattice distortions by quenching and flux pinning in superconducting RbBi$_2$

Sharon S. Philip, Junjie Yang, P. F. S. Rosa, J. D. Thompson, K. L. Page, Despina Louca

arXiv:2110.05452 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.104503 · 2021-10-11 · Physical Review B

T1experimental5 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The properties of RbBi$_2$, a 4.15 K superconductor, were investigated using magnetic field, pressure and neutron diffraction. Under hydrostatic pressure, an almost 50 % reduction of T$_c$ is observed, linked to a low Debye temperature estimated at 165 K. The resistivity and magnetic susceptibility were measured on quenched and slow-cooled polycrystalline samples. The resistivity follows a low temperature power-law dependence in both types of samples, while the diamagnetic susceptibility, $χ$, is dependent on the sample cooling history. Slow-cooled samples have a $χ= -1$ while quenched samples have $χ< -1$ due to grain size differences. Evidence of the effects of the cooling rate is also discerned from the local structure, obtained by neutron diffraction and the pair density function analysis. Slow-cooled samples have structurally symmetric Bi hexagons, in contrast to quenched samples in which disorder is manifested in periodic distortions of the Bi hexagonal rings of the kagome sublattice. Disorder may lead to flux pinning that reduces vortex mobility, but T$_c$ remains unaffected by the cooling rate.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
RbBi2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.12Pressure unresolvedunknown
RbBi2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.12Pressure unresolvedunknown

Similar papers