← Back to search

Ferroelectric tuning of superconductivity and band topology in a two-dimensional heterobilayer

Jianyong Chen, Ping Cui, Zhenyu Zhang

arXiv:2203.03082 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L060501 · 2022-03-07 · Physical Review B

T1experimental6 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Realization of tunable superconductivity with concomitant nontrivial band topology is conceptually intriguing and highly desirable for superconducting devices and topological quantum computation. Based on first-principles calculations, here we present the first prediction of simultaneously tunable superconducting transition temperature (Tc) and band topology in a superconducting IrTe2 overlayer on a ferroelectric In2Se3 monolayer. We first demonstrate that the Tc is substantially enhanced from that of IrTe2 nanoflakes (Tc ~3 K) due to significant charge repartitioning around the Fermi level. More importantly, the Tc is shown to sensitively depend on the In2Se3 polarization, with the higher Tc of ~(8-10) K attributed to enhanced interlayer electron-phonon coupling when the polarization is downward. The band topology is also switched from trivial to nontrivial as the polarization is reversed from upward to downward. These findings provide physically realistic platforms for simultaneously tuning superconductivity and band topology in two-dimensional heterobilayers and related heterostructures using a reversible and nonvolatile approach.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
IrTe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3Pressure not reportedunknown
IrTe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers