Interface superconductivity in FeSe thin films on SrTiO$_3$grown by the PLD technique
T. Kobayashi, H. Ogawa, F. Nabeshima, A. Maeda
arXiv:2203.04534 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/ac6d83 · 2022-03-09 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In this study, we fabricate 5-30-nm-thick films of FeSe/STO using pulsed laser deposition (PLD). The grown films exhibit superconductivity with an onset $T_{\mathrm{c}}$ that is much higher than that of bulk FeSe under ambient pressure. The observed $T_{\mathrm{c}}$ values are exceptionally high in terms of the strain vs. $T_{\mathrm{c}}$ relationship of the same material established so far. Furthermore, $T_{\mathrm{c}}$ increases as the film thickness decreases, except for films thinner than 10 nm. This thickness dependence of $T_{\mathrm{c}}$ is in good agreement with the results reported for films grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) that exhibit interface superconductivity. These results indicate the realization of interface superconductivity in PLD-grown FeSe/STO. Furthermore, our PLD technique requires no post-annealing to realize interface superconductivity, which is different from MBE techniques. Because the PLD technique has the advantage that various interfaces can be fabricated easily by simply altering the target materials, our results open novel routes to study interface superconductivity toward higher $T_{\mathrm{c}}$ by systematic control of the interface.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 38 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 50 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 46 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 65 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 19 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
Similar papers
Lattice Dynamics of Ultrathin FeSe Films on SrTiO3
similarity 0.93Shuyuan Zhang et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1801.01644
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Monolayer FeSe on SrTiO
similarity 0.93Dennis Huang & Jennifer E. Hoffman · 2017 · arXiv:1703.09306
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Positive and negative chemical pressure effects investigated in electron-doped FeSe films with an electric-double-layer structure
similarity 0.92N. Shikama et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.08865
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interfacial Superconductivity in FeSe Ultrathin Films on SrTiO3 Probed by In Situ Independently Driven Four-Point-Probe Measurements
similarity 0.92Asger K. Pedersen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropy of upper critical fields and interface superconductivity in FeSe/SrTiO3 grown by PLD
similarity 0.92Tomoki Kobayashi et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.11462
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High superconductivity at the FeSe/SrTiO Interface
similarity 0.92Fa Wang et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1202.4141
Source status unknown — claims are unverified