Tighter upper bounds on the critical temperature of two-dimensional superconductors and superfluids: Approaching the supremum
Ting ting Shi, Wei Zhang, C. A. R. Sa de Melo
arXiv:2203.05478 · 2022-03-10
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We discuss standard and tighter upper bounds on the critical temperature $T_c$ of two-dimensional superconductors and superfluids versus particle density n or filling factor $ν$, under the assumption that the transition from the normal to the superconducting (superfluid) phase is governed by the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) mechanism of vortex-antivortex binding and a direct relation between the superfluid density tensor and $T_c$ exists. The standard critical temperature upper bound $T_c^{\rm up1}$ is obtained from the Glover-Ferrell-Tinkham sum rule for the optical conductivity, which constrains the superfluid density tensor components. However, we show that $T_c^{\rm up1}$ is only useful in the limit of low particle/carrier density, where it may be close to the critical temperature supremum $T_c^{\rm sup}$ . For intermediate and high particle/carrier densities, $T_c^{\rm up1}$ is far beyond $T_c^{\rm sup}$ for any given interaction strength. We demonstrate that it is imperative to consider at least the full effects of phase fluctuations of the order parameter for superconductivity (superfluidity) to establish tighter bounds over a wide range of densities. Using the renormalization group, we obtain the critical temperature supremum for phase fluctuations $T_c$ and show that it is a much tighter upper bound to $T_c^{\rm sup}$ than $T_c^{\rm up1}$ for all particle/carrier densities. We conclude by indicating that if the $T_c$ is exceeded in experiments involving single band systems, then a non-BKT mechanism must be invoked.
Similar papers
Spin-triplet pair density wave superconductors
similarity 0.91Yi Zhang & Ziqiang Wang · 2024 · arXiv:2408.13886
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tighter upper bounds on the critical temperature of two-dimensional superconductors and superfluids from the BCS to the Bose regime
similarity 0.91Tingting Shi et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.10939
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonreciprocal Josephson current through a conical magnet
similarity 0.90Lina Johnsen Kamra & Liang Fu · 2024 · arXiv:2409.00223
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Challenges and opportunities for applications of unconventional superconductors
similarity 0.90Alex Gurevich · 2013 · arXiv:1308.2016
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum Geometric Effects on the Higgs Mode in Flat-band Superconductors
similarity 0.90Yuhang Xiao & Ning Hao · 2024 · arXiv:2409.10891
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Increasing superconducting by layering in the attractive Hubbard model
similarity 0.89Rodrigo A. Fontenele et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.17405
Source status unknown — claims are unverified