Tighter upper bounds on the critical temperature of two-dimensional superconductors and superfluids from the BCS to the Bose regime
Tingting Shi, Wei Zhang, C. A. R. Sá de Melo
arXiv:2303.10939 · 2023-03-20
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We discuss standard and tighter upper bounds on the critical temperature $T_c$ of two-dimensional (2D) superconductors and superfluids versus particle density $n$ or filling factor $ν$ for continuum and lattice systems from the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) to Bose regime. We discuss only one-band Hamiltonians, where the transition from the normal to superconducting (superfluid) phase is governed by Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) mechanism of vortex-antivortex binding, such that a direct relation between the superfluid density tensor and $T_c$ exists. We demonstrate that it is imperative to consider at least the full effect of phase fluctuations of order parameter for superconductivity (superfluidity) to establish tighter bounds. Using the renormalization group, we obtain phase-fluctuation critical temperature $T_c^θ$, a much tighter upper bound to critical temperature supremum $T_c^{\rm sup}$ than standard critical temperature upper bound $T_c^{\rm up1}$ from Ferrell-Glover-Tinkham sum rule. We go beyond textbook phase-fluctuation theories and show that chemical potential renormalization, order parameter equation, and Nelson-Kosterlitz relation need to be solved self-consistently and simultaneously with renormalization group flow equation to produce $T_c^θ$ over the entire BCS-Bose crossover. We note that an analytic theory including modulus fluctuations of the order parameter valid throughout the BCS-Bose evolution is still lacking, but the inclusion of modulus fluctuations can only produce a critical temperature lower than $T_c^θ$ and thus produce an even tighter bound to $T_c^{\rm sup}$. We conclude by indicating that if the measured critical temperature exceeds $T_c^θ$ in experiments involving 2D single-band systems, then a non-BKT mechanism must be invoked to describe the superconducting (superfluid) transition.
Similar papers
Tighter upper bounds on the critical temperature of two-dimensional superconductors and superfluids: Approaching the supremum
similarity 0.92Ting ting Shi et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.05478
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bounds on the Superconducting Transition Temperature: Applications to Twisted Bilayer Graphene and Cold Atoms
similarity 0.91Tamaghna Hazra et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Density induced BCS-Bose evolution in gated two-dimensional superconductors: The Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition as a function of carrier density
similarity 0.90Tingting Shi et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.10010
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Heuristic bounds on superconductivity and how to exceed them
similarity 0.89Johannes S. Hofmann et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2105.09322
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum phase-field model: vortices and THz-induced gap dynamics in superconductors
similarity 0.89R. Y. Fang et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2410.05216
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity of incoherent electrons in Yukawa-SYK model
similarity 0.89Laura Classen & Andrey Chubukov · 2021 · arXiv:2106.12078
Source status unknown — claims are unverified