Emergent gauge field from self-referencing phase factor on many-body wave functions and superconductivity
Hiroyasu Koizumi
arXiv:2203.06538 · 2022-03-13
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductivity is a phenomenon where electrical current flows without friction. The current standard theory for it is the BCS (Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer) theory, which explains it as due to the energy gap formation by the electron-pairing, and the key ingredient for the supercurrent generation is the gauge symmetry breaking brought about by it. It was thought that superconductivity was fully understood by this standard theory; however, the discovery of superconductivity in cuprates in 1986 changed this situation, showing a number of experimental results that contradict the standard theory. It is also notable that the standard theory contradicts in the supecurrent carrier mass in the London moment; the predicted mass is an effective mass, while the experimental value is the free electron mass. The above contradictions suggest the necessity for a fundamental revision for the theory of superconductivity. Here we show that the required revision may be achieved by using the Berry phase formalism. It was developed after the establishment of the BCS theory, and provides a way to detect emergent gauge fields. A self-referencing phase factor on the wave function detected by the Berry phase formalism explains the supercurrent generation in the conventional and cuprate superconductors. It gives rise to a gauge field that enables the gauge symmetry breaking in the standard theory interpretation.
Similar papers
Constrained Hamiltonian dynamics for electrons in magnetic field and additional forces besides the Lorentz force acting on electrons
similarity 0.91Hiroyasu Koizumi · 2024 · arXiv:2404.18019
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Neglected phase in the Schroedinger representation of quantum mechanics and particle number conserving formalisms for superconductivity
similarity 0.90Hiroyasu Koizumi · 2022 · arXiv:2211.08759
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Brueckner -matrix approach to two-dimensional Fermi gases with the finite-range attractive interaction
similarity 0.90Hikaru Sakakibara et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.03446
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Schroedinger representation of quantum mechanics, Berry connection, and superconductivity
similarity 0.89Hiroyasu Koizumi · 2022 · arXiv:2205.07665
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting properties of Fibonacci chains with enhanced superconducting pairing at the boundaries
similarity 0.89Quanyong Zhu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.02900
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Momentum and doping dependence of spin excitations in electron-doped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.89Pengfei Jing et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1610.05041
Source status unknown — claims are unverified