Colossal transverse magnetoresistance due to nematic superconducting phase fluctuations in a copper oxide
Jonatan Wårdh, Mats Granath, Jie Wu, A. T. Bollinger, Xi He, Ivan Božović
arXiv:2203.06769 · DOI 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad255 · 2022-03-13 · PNAS Nexus
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Electronic anisotropy (or `nematicity') has been detected in all main families of cuprate superconductors by a range of experimental techniques -- electronic Raman scattering, THz dichroism, thermal conductivity, torque magnetometry, second-harmonic generation -- and was directly visualized by scanning tunneling microscope (STM) spectroscopy. Using angle-resolved transverse resistance (ARTR) measurements, a very sensitive and background-free technique that can detect 0.5$\%$ anisotropy in transport, we have observed it also in La$_{2-x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_{4}$ (LSCO) for $0.02 \leq x \leq 0.25$. Arguably the key enigma in LSCO is the rotation of the nematic director with temperature; this has not been seen before in any material. Here, we address this puzzle by measuring the angle-resolved transverse magnetoresistance (ARTMR) in LSCO. We report a discovery of colossal transverse magnetoresistance (CTMR) -- an order-of-magnitude drop in the transverse resistivity in the magnetic field of $6\,$T, while none is seen in the longitudinal resistivity. We show that the apparent rotation of the nematic director is caused by superconducting phase fluctuations, which are much more anisotropic than the normal-electron fluid, and their respective directors are not parallel. This qualitative conclusion is robust and follows straight from the raw experimental data. We quantify this by modelling the measured (magneto-)conductivity by a sum of two conducting channels that correspond to distinct anisotropic Drude and Cooper-pair effective mass tensors. Strikingly, the anisotropy of Cooper-pair stiffness is significantly larger than that of the normal electrons, and it grows dramatically on the underdoped side, where the fluctuations become effectively quasi-one dimensional.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Paraconductivity of pseudogapped superconductors
similarity 0.89Igor Poboiko & Mikhail Feigel'man · 2017 · arXiv:1710.02363
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic reconstruction and enhanced superconductivity at LaNdSrCuO/LaSrCuO bilayer interface
similarity 0.88P. K. Rout et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1208.3318
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluctuation Phenomena in Superconductors
similarity 0.88A. I. Larkin & A. A. Varlamov · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0109177
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dimensional crossovers in the Gaussian critical fluctuations above of two-layer and three-layer superconductors
similarity 0.88A. S. Viz et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2412.18251
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous Expansion of the Copper-Apical Oxygen Distance in Superconducting LaCuO - LaSrCuO Bilayers
similarity 0.88Hua Zhou et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0903.2097
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nematic single-component superconductivity and loop-current order from pair-density wave instability
similarity 0.88Jonatan Wårdh & Mats Granath · 2022 · arXiv:2203.08250
Source status unknown — claims are unverified