Development of a near-5-Kelvin, cryogen-free, pulse-tube refrigerator-based scanning probe microscope
Jun Kasai, Tomoki Koyama, Munenori Yokota, Katsuya Iwaya
arXiv:2204.01195 · DOI 10.1063/5.0084888 · 2022-04-04 · The Review of scientific instruments
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report the design and performance of a cryogen-free, pulse-tube refrigerator (PTR)-based scanning probe microscopy (SPM) system capable of operating at the base temperature of near 5K. We achieve this by combining a home-made interface design between the PTR cold head and the SPM head, with an automatic gas-handling system. The interface design isolates the PTR vibrations by a combination of polytetrafluoroethylene and stainless-steel bellows, and by placing the SPM head on a passive vibration isolation table via two cold stages that are connected to thermal radiation shields using copper heat links. The gas-handling system regulates the helium heat-exchange gas pressures, facilitating both the cool down to and the maintenance of the base temperature. We discuss the effects of each component using measured vibration, current-noise, temperature, and pressure data. We demonstrate that our SPM system performance is comparable to known liquid-helium-based systems with the measurements of the superconducting gap spectrum of Pb, atomic-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy image and quasiparticle interference pattern of Au(111) surface, and non-contact atomic force microscopy image of NaCl(100) surface. Without the need for cryogen refills, the current SPM system enables uninterrupted low-temperature measurements.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Critical Currents in Conventional Josephson Junctions With Grain Boundaries
similarity 1.00Miguel Antonio Sulangi et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.10907
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
In-situ uniaxial pressure cell for X-ray and neutron scattering experiments
similarity 1.00G. Simutis et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2207.13194
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Polarization analysis of terahertz emission from Bi-2212 cross-whisker intrinsic Josephson junction and its refractive index
similarity 1.00Yoshito Saito et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.08506
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supercurrent diode effect in thin film Nb tracks
similarity 1.00N. Satchell et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.02706
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in hyperdoped Ge by molecular beam epitaxy
similarity 1.00Patrick J. Strohbeen et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.04610
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
SQUID-based superconducting microcalorimeter with in-situ tunable gain
similarity 1.00Constantin Schuster & Sebastian Kempf · 2023 · arXiv:2310.03489
Source status unknown — claims are unverified