← Back to search

Novel Increase of Superconducting Critical Temperature of an Iron-Superconductor due to Ion Implantation

Kriti R Sahu, Thomas Wolf, A K Mishra, A Banerjee, V Ganesan, Udayan De

arXiv:2204.03491 · 2022-04-07

T1experimental

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Energetic ion irradiation usually decreases superconducting critical temperature(Tc), with the few exceptions involving increases up to a few K only. However, our recent 2.5X10^15 Ar/cm2 irradiations by 1.5 MeV Ar6+ enhanced Tc of the single crystal Fe-superconductor Ba(Fe0.943Co0.057)2As2 by 8.2 K from its initial onset Tc of ~16.9 K as measured from the real part of the magnetic susceptibility, matching measurements from the imaginary part, electrical resistivity and magnetization. Ozaki et al. (2016) explained their Tc increase of 0.5 K in FeSe0.5Te0.5 films with the thickness (t) < the irradiating proton range (R), as due to a nanoscale compressive strain developed from radiation damage of the lattice. Here, Ar irradiation with t > R results in an Ar implanted layer in our crystal. Implanted inert gas atoms often agglomerate into high-pressure bubbles to exert a large compressive strain on the lattice. We suggest that this additional compressive strain could be the reason for such a large (~49%) Tc increase.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Ba(Fe0.943Co0.057)2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

16.9Pressure not reportedonset
Ba(Fe0.943Co0.057)2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

25.1Pressure not reportedonset
FeSe0.5Te0.5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers